Archive for April, 2009

ISI Picks Up 3 Journalists in Peshawar

cid_image007Three journalists from the NWFP were arrested by ISI for the purpose of extracting the source of news about military operations in Buneer, where the Taliban has taken over control of the city; they were however subsequently released. The ISI had earlire declared that the three journalists would
not be released until and unless the journalists, one in particularly,
Mr. Dilawar Jan disclosed the source of his news about the start of
military operation in the area.

 

On the other hand, Taliban Pakistan has threatened the journalists of the country that if they continue to criticize the Taliban type of justice system, the Nizam-e-Adl (NAR), they would be treated with dire consequences and would be tried in Taliban courts.

According to the information received from Mr. Hamid Mir, the
prominent anchor person of the Geo Television program, the Capital
Talk, on Wednesday, April 29, 2009, a journalist of the TheNews
International at NWFP province, Mr. Dilawar Jan, was asked by the
officials of the ISI to disclose the source of a news item about the start of the military operation in the Buneer, the Taliban controlled area. Mr. Jan, however, refused to disclose his sources as it was against the ethics of journalism. At 16 hours he was again contacted by the ISI officials and instructed to come to office of the ISI at Peshawar Cantonment, in the heart of the provincial capital. As he reached the station office of the ISI, he was detained there until the disclosure of the source of his story.

But at 18 hours the government and the military themselves announced
that a military operation has already initiated in the Buneer against
the Taliban militants, even then ISI wanted to know about the source
of disclosure of the operation before it was officially announced.

In the late hours of the same day, two other journalists, namely Mr.
Mushtaq Yousufzai and Mr. Bukhar Shah, had gone to ISI provincial
head quarters and enquired about the illegal detention of Mr. Dilawar
Jan but both of them were also held arbitrary till the disclosure of
the source of the news. Mr. Hamid Mir tried to keep in contact with the intelligence officers for the release of the journalists but he was told that they were not under arrest and they would be released soon. At 23:30 hours the Geo Television broadcast the news of the illegal detention of Mr. Dilawar Jan by the ISI, but purposely avoided to inform about the illegal detention of two other journalists as it would create panic in the journalist community and would give a bad name to the Pakistan armed forces. The spokesperson of the arm forces of the Pakistan has shown his inability to comment on the arrest of the three journalists.

Leave a Comment

OK to Rape Your Wife

clip_12

President Karzai bowed to international pressure in late April 2009 by promising to amend a new law condoning marital rape and child marriage that provoked violent clashes in Kabul.

The Shia Family Law, signed by the Afghan President in March, appeared to reintroduce the draconian policies of the Taleban era, such as a ban on married women leaving their homes without their husbands’ permission. The law applies to the 15 per cent of Afghans who are Shia Muslims.

Afghanistan’s constitution guarantees equality of the sexes and the country is also a signatory to the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. However, hardline theologians argue that all other provisions are overridden by Article Three of the Constitution, which guarantees that nothing contrary to the “beliefs and provisions of Islam” is permissible in Afghan law. Mr Karzai’s climbdown came a day after he said that he had been unaware of its content when he signed it.


The controversial provisions were buried in the 239-page document, much of it written in dense theological jargon. Mr Karzai said that his aides had not briefed him properly about the details. Many opponents of the law have said that it did not pass through the normal channels, that would have included discussion of all the articles, because MPs were advised to let the Shia community determine the details of their own laws – a right granted by the constitution.

One article stipulates that the wife “is bound to preen for her husband as and when he desires”. Another passage sanctions marital rape. “As long as the husband is not travelling he has the right to have sexual intercourse with his wife every fourth night . . . Unless the wife is ill or has any kind of illness that intercourse could aggravate, the wife is bound to give a positive response to the sexual desires of her husband.”

Article 133 reintroduces the Taleban restrictions on women’s movements outside their homes, stating: “A wife cannot leave the house without the permission of the husband” unless in a medical or other emergency.

Article 27 endorses child marriage, with girls legally able to marry once they begin to menstruate. The law also withholds from the woman the right to inherit her husband’s wealth.

Leave a Comment

Breakdown of Liter of Oil in Pakistan

“>From: Samreen Khan <samreen.khan.80@googlemail.com>
Date: Apr 27, 2009 11:38 AM
Subject: FACTS RELATING TO OIL PRICES IN PAKISTAN

cid_112232307154web56604mailre3Summary of important facts relating to the prices of petroleum products in Pakistan 
 

Breakup of current Petrol Prices

  

Formula                                                                                            26.75
Inland Freight                                                                                      01.18
Dealers and OMC Margin                                                                   02.63

Petroleum Development Levy                                                   19.15
Excise Duty                                                                                         00.00
Sales Tax (16% on above)                                                        07.95

 

Petrol per litre                                                                                57.66

 

 

From above, it is clear that around 47% of the petrol prices comprises of taxes and duties and the actual price of petrol is only 53% of the current prices.

 

The same is true for the other five products given in the above table. The extra amount of duty named “PDL” could be easily removed / lowered to give relief to the poor people. It could help reduce inflation in our country substantially.

 

Maximum PDL on petroleum products levied:

The following table shows the maximum PDL levied on the petroleum products:

                                                                                                                                                                               
MOTOR GASOLINE  (PETROL)                                                     29.49                              

Effective December 16, 2008 to December 31, 2008

 

HI-OCTANE                                                        41.57                               

Effective November 1, 2008 to November 15, 2008

 

DIESEL                                                           17.77                        

Effective March 1, 2009

 

LIGHT DIESEL OIL                                                               13.09                              

Effective March 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009

 

KEROSENE OIL                                                               15.89                              

Effective March 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009

 

Previous data for diesel prices could not be found on the internet. Therefore, the latest price for the month of March 2009 has been taken for the purpose of above analysis.

 

Previously, there was a subsidy on Light Diesel Oil and Kerosene Oil, that is mostly used in agricultural areas of Pakistan however, in the last few months the subsidy has been removed and petroleum development levy has been included in the price per litre of these products.

 

This levy can be easily removed or lowered substantially, in order to reduce the prices of agricultural products in Pakistan. As we all know that fuel prices has a direct effect on the prices of food products, therefore, by removing this PDL (an extra duty) we can easily reduce inflation in our country. This is the easiest and most appropriate way of giving relief to the poor. This will have a direct effect on the people of our country.

 

Why is this duty not been abolished when the related PDC has been abolished?

 

Why the benefit of lower oil prices is not being transferred to the people of Pakistan?

 

Where is the money collected from PDL being spent when no subsidy is being given?

 

Who is responsible for this? How should we make people aware of this situation?

 

How can we ask the responsible persons for given proper justification for this action?

 

Notes:

The international prices are determined by OGRA in accordance with the Import Parity Formula.

 

Sources:

 

All the information given above has been taken from the website of OGRA which is a public information. http://www.ogra.org.pk

Leave a Comment

Rehman Malik, Pakistan’s Interior Minister

cid__1_0699300406992db0003488d24525759a

Comments (1)

Is Pakistan Caving in to Perverted Interpretation of Islam?

Anti Terrorism Campaign in Pakistan

 

cid_32232307154web56604mailre3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A society that is behind times and is caving to perverted interpretation of Islam by stubborn rigid thinking clerics whose claim to knowledge of Islam is the size of their shaggy beards. It may be noted that all taliban leaders, Ben Laden included has shaggy beards. As such if Pakistan desire to have social peace and order, it should put social pressure on the mullahs to keep tidy beards to make themselves more amenable to the society. This sector of the community, suffers from social inadequacies .To over come them, it has perverted the religion values to satisfy their emotional needs, professing them to be religion dictates and themselves to be students of religion interpreting its values to make them accepted by the intellectual sectors of the society.

 

In general, Pakistan society is secular. People by temperament are passive. They are follower’s type and not the leader type. As such the society went along with the preaching of Islam (perverted) by the mullahs to suite their political objectives with out challenging them, for it did not affect their daily lives, except made women feel uncomfortable.

 

From the early Islamic days learning, civility had been symbolised by beard for some unknown reason. However with passage of time, mullah’s did not keep pace with learning, only retained the symbol of it “beard”, calling for prayers five times a day in Arabic by way of memorising it from the Quran. All this required no knowledge and enabled to project as a sector of society versed in interpretation of Quran in regional language and dialects. By this farce they integrated in the society as religion students. Once having integrated with in learned sector of the society, they started propagating bigotry and extremism as Islamic commandments. A sector of the society began to accept their interpretation of Islam, for they did not have access to alternative source of knowledge and sought easily obtainable religion knowledge for emotional solace from mullahs. Mullahs spread fear by way of their teaching of religion dictates to control vulnerable class of people to make a political base for them by way of showing way to paradise evident in the trend of suicide bombers.

 

When emotionally insecure people with personality disorders attempt to gain acceptability by the normal sector of the society, they tend to dominate the weaker sector of the society by spreading fear by some excuse or the other. As such all heat had been directed by the mullah’s towards the women, minorities by distorted religion values as propagated by them.  Society accepting them as coming from religion students.

 

Mullahs have the agenda to take the country to their level of thinking gradually. It is this agenda that has given rise to talibanism in the country.

 

If the Pakistan society would shed its passivity toward mullahism believing it does not affect their every day lives and take corrective steps it could save itself from drifting further 500 years back in time. In my view they are as follow:

 

1 Reject their religion teaching for more enlighten version of Quran interpretation

 

2. Marginalize their role in national politics and society. It may be noted that only 2% of the electorate voted for mullah’s political parties in the last Pakistan election.

 

3 .Extend income support to people to seek alternative source of religion knowledge that is provided by the mullahs and facilitates its availability

 

4. Stop use of mosques for purposes other then prayers.

 

5.Flush out their influence from defence forces, executive and judiciary. It is infested by mullahism as rodent.

 

6 Media to mount social cultural programmes to marginalize their influence

in ordinary daily lives of the people. At present society tacitly accept mullahism.  

 

7 Deal with severity with anti social activities such as infringement of women civil rights, sectarianism, destruction of national wealth in Pakistan territory.

 

8.Society give clear message to this sector that mullahism (perversion of Islamic values) and it’s preaching will not be tolerated in any form. It being demonstrated  by action and not by statement of intent only. As is at present.

 

9 Country to form strong national government of unity with heavy weight politicians with clear mind set of dealing with extremism.

 

10 Resolve Kashmir issue by agreeing its principle immediately.

 

11. Organise peace marches and demonstration in FATA and major cities.

 

S.A.Khan

41 Giles Coppice,

London SE19 1XF GB

 

I

Comments (1)

Pakistan is Playing a Double Game

Pakistan is providing strategic depth to Taliban, LET, Lashkare Jhangvi and other terrorist organizations so that the militants can carry out cross border terrorism in both Afghanistan and India and return to Pakistan’s settled areas like Swat, or Punjab, where the US, UK or India cannot attack them. 

Pakistan desires to raise tensions with India, and keep collecting billions from the West.

The US cannot use drones to destroy the terrorists in the settle areas of Pakistan like Swat and Punjab under present circumstances. The US and International community may be forced to take actions for Global security, if the situation gets from bad to worse.

 The United States made it clear that it would attack the Taliban in Swat valley unless the Pakistani government stopped their advance.

A senior Pakistani official told The Sunday Times that the American government intervened after Taliban moved in Buner.  In Washington, officials feared that the country pivotal to the US war in Afghanistan and against Al Qaeda was succumbing to extremists.

“The implicit threat – if you don’t do it, we may have to – was always there,” said the official. He said that under American pressure, the ISI agency told the Taliban on Friday to withdraw from Buner. However, the Taliban withdrawal was less than total. 
 

It is only a matter of time before Pakistan linked Islamic terrorists attack the West, using dirty nukes. The withdrawal of Taliban from Buner in Pakistan’s North is ’stage-managed’ as many Talibans have just disappeared in Civilian areas. Pakistan’s army does NOT want to fight the Talibans, otherwise it could have easily destroyed  about 2000 militants in Swat. However, Pakistan’s army has never any problems when it takes on the opponents in Balochistan and kills them, using Jet Fighters, Gunships, Bombs and Missiles.

Pakistan’s army and ISI Intelligence agency continue to send Isalmic Terrorists in to India and the following MEDIA report is one more proof of Pakistan’s  support for global Islamic Terrorism.

Sincerely

Mr Vipul Thakore

24 Buckingham Gate

London SW1E 6LB. UK.

Email: thakorevipul@hotmail.com

 

 

Comments (1)

An Open Letter to Gen Kiyani by an Indian

View from the other side Col (r) Harish Puri

April 14, 2009

Dear Gen Kayani,

jawanoSir, let me begin by recounting that old army quip that did the rounds in the immediate aftermath of World war II: To guarantee victory, an army should ideally have German generals, British officers, Indian soldiers, American equipment and Italian enemies.

A Pakistani soldier that I met in Iraq in 2004 lamented the fact that the Pakistani soldier in Kargil had been badly let down firstly by Nawaz Sharif and then by the Pakistani officers’ cadre. Pakistani soldiers led by Indian officers, , he believed, would be the most fearsome combination possible. Pakistani officers, he went on to say, were more into real estate, defence housing colonies and the like.

As I look at two photographs of surrender that lie before me, I can’t help recalling his words. The first is the celebrated event at Dhaka on Dec 16, 1971, which now adorns most Army messes in Delhi and Calcutta. The second, sir, is the video of a teenage girl being flogged by the Taliban in Swat — not far, I am sure, from one of your Army check posts.

The surrender by any Army is always a sad and humiliating event. Gen Niazi surrendered in Dhaka to a professional army that had outnumbered and outfought him. No Pakistani has been able to get over that humiliation, and 16th December is remembered as a black day by the Pakistani Army and the Pakistani state. But battles are won and lost – armies know this, and having learnt their lessons, they move on.

But much more sadly, the video of the teenager being flogged represents an even more abject surrender by the Pakistani Army. The surrender in 1971, though humiliating, was not disgraceful. This time around, sir, what happened on your watch was something no Army commander should have to live through. The girl could have been your own daughter, or mine.

I have always maintained that the Pakistani Army, like its Indian counterpart, is a thoroughly professional outfit. It has fought valiantly in the three wars against India, and also accredited itself well in its UN missions abroad. It is, therefore, by no means a pushover. The instance of an Infantry unit, led by a lieutenant colonel, meekly laying down arms before 20-odd militants should have been an aberration. But this capitulation in Swat, that too so soon after your own visit to the area, is an assault on the sensibilities of any soldier. What did you tell your soldiers? What great inspirational speech did you make that made your troops back off without a murmur? Sir, I have fought insurgency in Kashmir as well as the North-East, but despite the occasional losses suffered (as is bound to be the case in counter-insurgency operations), such total surrender is unthinkable.

I have been a signaller, and it beats me how my counterparts in your Signal Corps could not locate or even jam a normal FM radio station broadcasting on a fixed frequency at fixed timings. Is there more than meets the eye?

I am told that it is difficult for your troops to “fight their own people.” But you never had that problem in East Pakistan in 1971, where the atrocities committed by your own troops are well documented in the Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report. Or is it that the Bengalis were never considered “your own” people, influenced as they were by the Hindus across the border? Or is that your troops are terrified by the ruthless barbarians of the Taliban?

Sir, it is imperative that we recognise our enemy without any delay. I use the word “our” advisedly – for the Taliban threat is not far from India’s borders. And the only force that can stop them from dragging Pakistan back into the Stone Age is the force that you command. In this historic moment, providence has placed a tremendous responsibility in your hands. Indeed, the fate of your nation, the future of humankind in the subcontinent rests with you. It doesn’t matter if it is “my war” or “your war” – it is a war that has to be won. A desperate Swati citizen’s desperate lament says it all – “Please drop an atom bomb on us and put us out of our misery!” Do not fail him, sir.

But in the gloom and the ignominy, the average Pakistani citizen has shown us that there is hope yet. The lawyers, the media, have all refused to buckle even under direct threats. It took the Taliban no less than 32 bullets to still the voice of a brave journalist. Yes, there is hope – but why don’t we hear the same language from you? Look to these brave hearts, sir – and maybe we shall see the tide turn. Our prayers are with you, and the hapless people of Swat.

The New York Times predicts that Pakistan will collapse in six months. Do you want to go down in history as the man who allowed that to happen?

 

Leave a Comment

Is Pakistan Nearing Collapse?

clip_2The move by Taliban-backed militants into the Buner district of northwestern Pakistan, closer than ever to Pakistan’s capital of Islamabad, have prompted concerns both within the country and abroad that the nuclear-armed nation of 165 million is on the verge of inexorable collapse.

 

On April 22, a local Taliban militia crossed from the Swat Valley – where a February cease-fire allowed the implementation of strict Islamic, or Shari’a, law – into the neighboring Buner district, which is just a few hours drive from Islamabad (65 miles, separated by a mountain range, as the crow flies).

 

Residents streaming from Buner, home to nearly a million people, said that armed militants are patrolling the streets. Pakistani television stations aired footage of Taliban soldiers looting government offices and capturing vehicles belonging to aid organizations and development projects. The police, say residents, are nowhere to be seen. The shrine of a local Muslim saint, venerated across the country, was closed. The Taliban, which adheres to a stricter version of Islam than is practiced in most of Pakistan, hold that worship at such shrines goes against the teachings of Islam.

 

Meanwhile courts throughout the Malakand division, of which Swat and Buner are a part, have closed in deference to the new agreement calling for the implementation Shari’a, law. “If the Taliban continue to move at this pace they will soon be knocking at the doors of Islamabad,” Maulana Fazlur Rehman, head of one of the country’s Islamic political parties, warned in Parliament. Rehman said the Margalla Hills, a small mountain range north of the capital that separates it from Buner, appears to be “the only hurdle in their march toward the federal capital,” The only solution, he said, was for the entire nation to accept Shari’a law in order to deprive the Taliban of their principal cause.

 

The fall of Buner is raising international alarm. Speaking before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton characterized the situation was a danger to Pakistan, the U.S. and the world. “We cannot underscore the seriousness of the existential threat posed to the state of Pakistan by continuing advances, now within hours of Islamabad, that are being made by a loosely confederated group of terrorists and others who are seeking the overthrow of the Pakistani state,” Clinton said. She also accused Pakistan’s leaders of “basically abdicating to the Taliban and the extremists” by signing the cease-fire agreement.

 

Even before the fall of Buner, the capital was in a state of panic. Private schools were closed for two weeks for fear that militants would attempt a siege, along the lines of the Taliban attack on a police academy in Lahore last month. And an unspecified threat against foreigners two weeks ago resulted in the closure of the U.S. embassy and the British High Commission for a day.

 

On April 19, just a week after Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari signed a provision allowing for the implementation of Islamic law in Malakand, Sufi Mohammad, the local religious leader who negotiated the accord (and who is father-in-law to the local Taliban leader), announced that he would not recognize the Supreme Court of Pakistan, even in cases of appeal. He also said that while the Taliban fighters would adhere to the peace agreement, they would not give up their arms

 

Pakistan’s ambassador to the U.S., Husain Haqqani, defended the government’s concession to the Taliban, denying in an interview with CNN that the cease-fire agreement amounted to capitulation. He justified the action by comparing it to the 2006 U.S.-led Anbar Awakening in Iraq in which U.S. military commanders struck agreements with moderate jihadists. “We are open to criticism of that strategy, but to think that that strategy somehow represents an abdication of our responsibility toward our people and toward the security of our country and the region is incorrect,” Haqqani said.

Also on Wednesday, a top adviser to PM Gilani made an explosive announcement accusing a long-simmering separatist movement in the province of Baluchistan of being sponsored by archenemy India and Afghanistan. The mysterious deaths of several Baluch leaders over the past few weeks have renewed demands for Baluch independence from the nation of Pakistan.

 

The implication by Rehman Malik, Gilani’s Interior Affairs adviser, that neighboring countries were fomenting instability in Pakistan will only heighten regional tensions at a moment when the country is least equipped to deal with them. Already columnists in several Pakistani newspapers are warning of a return to 1971, when a separatist movement in East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, ended with a civil war that split the nation.

 

David Kilcullen, a counter-terrorism expert for both the Bush and the Obama administrations, warned that Pakistan is on the brink of collapse. “Afghanistan doesn’t worry me,” Kilcullen said in an April 12 interview with the Sydney Morning Herald. “Pakistan does. We have to face the fact that if Pakistan collapses it will dwarf anything we have seen so far in whatever we’re calling the war on terror now.”

During an April 16 conference in Tokyo to raise donations for his beleaguered nation, President Zardari warned that terrorists operating in the country posed a global threat. At that conference, countries including the U.S. and Japan pledged more than $5 billion to improve health, education and governance in Pakistan.

 

But with security and stability increasingly in doubt, it’s becoming clear that more urgent action is needed beyond financial donations aimed at institution-building. Neither Zardari nor opposition leaders have been able to come up with answers to the insurgency. Columnist Kamila Hyat, writing in The News, called for an overhaul of current strategies, including reaching out to Pakistan’s old foe, India. If Pakistan doesn’t have to worry about protecting its eastern flank, she argued, it can concentrate on solving its internal problems. “The only option for Pakistan is to break free of the militant grip, focus on building a new relationship with India and realize the only hope for a brighter future lies in building regional harmony rather than waging war.” It’s a sound proposal for the long term, but with the Taliban already taking advantage of the peace deal in Swat to expand their reach, Pakistan may be forced into negotiating with militants first.

 

Leave a Comment

Sardarji’s Mom’s Letter To Her Son in Canada

img_7530Dear Banta Vahe Guru !

I am in a well here and hoping you are in the same well there.

I’m writing this letter slowly, because I know you cannot read fast.

We don’t live where we did when you left home. Your dad read in the newspaper that most accidents happen 20 miles from home, so we moved 20 miles. I wont be able to send the address as the last Sardar who stayed here took the house numbers with them for their new house so they would not have to change their address. Hopefully by next week we will be able to bring our earlier address plate here, so that our address will remain same too.

This place is really nice. It even has a washing machine, situated right above the commode. I’m not sure it works. Last week I put in 3 shirts, pulled the chain and haven’t seen them since.

The weather here isn’t too bad. It rained only twice last week. The first time it rained for 3 days and second time for 4 days.

The coat you wanted me to send you, your Aunt said it would be a little too heavy to send in the mail with all the metal buttons, so we cut them off and put them in the pocket.

Your father has another job. He has 500 men under him. He is cutting the grass at the cemetery.

By the way I took Bahu to our club’s poolside. The manager is really badmash. He told her that two-piece swimming suit is not allowed in this club. We were confused as to which piece should we remove?

Your sister had a baby this morning. I haven’t found out whether it is a girl or a boy, so I don’t know whether you are an Aunt or Uncle.

Your uncle, Jetinder fell in a nearby well. Some men tried to pull him out, but he fought them off bravely and drowned. We cremated him and he burned for three days.

Your best friend, Balwinder, is no more. He died trying to fulfill his father’s last wishes. His father had wished to be buried at sea after he died. And your friend died while in the process of digging a grave for his father.

There isn’t much more news this time. Nothing much has happened.

P.S: Beta, I was going to send you some money but by the time I realized, I had already sealed off this letter.

Comments (1)

Only Ayaz Amir has the Balls in the Parliament

by Sadaf Junaid Zuberi sjzuberi@gmail.com

clip_1280It was a sad day on April 12. The government, and the parliament together in a matter of few minutes gave in to hardcore militants and terrorists by handing them over the valley we once called the Switzerland of Pakistan. Why did the government prefer to relinquish its writ remains unclear. I for one cannot believe that army, intelligence and the entire government machinery put together could not have resisted Taliban in the valley of Swat. And if they genuinely could not, I like many others feel vulnerable sitting in this metropolis.

The proceedings in the parliament added to the frustration of a common citizen. Not only our law enforcement agencies, army and government incapable to contain Taliban but our public representatives ‘scared’ to utter a word. Hence the ordinance sailed through. Where do the hapless citizens go? There is no respite.. Today it is the valley of Swat; tomorrow it could be some other city, region within the country. We have set a very wrong precedence.

Kudos to Ayaz Amir for taking a bold stand against the Taliban in the assembly. When everyone appeared scared and dared not to utter a word, Ayaz not only spoke but spoke fearlessly. Thank god for people like him.

Moreover, while I am no supporter of MQM, I feel they also deserve shaabash for taking a courageous stand against the Taliban. All of their members stayed away from voting in protest. We need such bold people in our assemblies. Even one JUI member stood up to ask which shariah are they going to impose.

Strangely, as the report tells us, no woman member said a word against the deal which is going to impact women the most. All the so-called activists who perhaps find it fashionable to talk about womens rights were exposed when the time came to stand up for those rights.

In a show of rare defiance, PML-N MNA Ayaz Amir stood up to the otherwise compliant members of his own and other parties in the National Assembly, probably in the light of open threats by Tehrike Taliban (TTP) leaders to launch attacks on those who would dare to defy the deal. The MQM also showed some spine.

Ayaz Amir, a liberal intellectual and columnist, was the only parliamentarian to shout, “This agreement was signed under the shadow of guns and most importantly the guns of Taliban had turned out to be more powerful than the guns of our Pakistan Army.”

It was crystal clear that the serious threats of Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan, carried by all the morning newspapers on their front pages, were very much on the minds of all the scared looking parliamentarians. So except for those in favour of the deal, no one from the Punjab or Sindh spoke out.

None of them asked any tough questions from a visibly browbeaten Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani, who too was seen content with the fast falling writ of the state and his government, as many believed that a new state within the state had been created.

But, Ayaz Amir shined when he took a clear line during the debate, which was opposed to that of Nisar Ali Khan, his party leader in the House. Mr Amir did not have any doubt in his mind that this deal with Taliban would not work when he said: “We should not kid with ourselves.”

The desperate pleas of a genuinely worried Ayaz were, however, of no use, as his parliamentary leader Nisar Ali Khan had already given up in the face of mounting pressure from the supporters of the deal with the Taliban in the Parliament.

That was why, for obvious reasons, Ayaz Amir had little room left to say something more to condemn this deal after Nisar Ali Khan decided to back it. But, even then, left alone from all corners, Ayaz Amir was seen doing his best to criticise those powerful elements who were behind the deal to hand over Swat to the Taliban, which he believed was taken on gun point as Pakistan Army could not match the guns of the militants, or it did not want to.

Without naming Chaudhry Nisar Ali, Ayaz Amir clearly snubbed him, as he raised several valid objections which otherwise should have been raised by his party leader in the house. Only two sane voices were heard in the house of 342. But the most shocking part of these proceedings was that not a single woman parliamentarian stood up to protest the sweeping laws which would greatly affect the women of Swat.

Ayaz recalled the history of Pakistan and said whenever such attempts were made to Islamise the society, they had backfired. He wondered how could we stop the Taliban from controlling the neighboring areas of Swat and gave the example of Buner. He did not have any doubt that the army had failed to take control of the situation and the politicians were now acting from a weaker position after having left with no option.

The MNA from Chakwal, an obvious target for Taliban where they carried out a suicide bombing recently, wondered how Muslims which could not agree on a definition of Shariah in 1400 years, would now achieve this goal in Swat. Ironically Ayaz even paid rich tributes to MQM leader Farooq Sattar for what he believed was a wonderful speech against the deal in Swat.

Another dissident voice came from the MNA of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Sahibzada Fazal Karim who too questioned as to whose Shariah was being implemented in Swat where the followers of all sects resided. “If the Shariah of one sect is being imposed in Swat, we don’t accept it. Who would give us the guarantees of safety and security,” he asked but found no one responding to his loud questions.

All the women, mostly belonging to the elite class of the country sitting in the Parliament conveniently preferred to stay quiet as they did not heed to the warning of MQM leader Farooq Sattar who said a day would soon come when the Taliban would issue a fatwa against the presence of women parliamentarians in the house as, according to them, it was also against their Shariah.

It was being widely expected that some protest by the women parliamentarians would be registered and the most relevant question from PM Gilani about how the rights of women would be protected in Swat Valley, would be asked. But it was not.

Just two weeks ago, a horrible video had shocked the whole world when a poor girl of 17 years was flogged. None of the 80 female MPs representing different political parties raised the issue, as if they had not seen the video. Liberal PPP MNAs Sherry Rehman and Fauzia Wahab, who had been championing the cause of human and women rights during the long 12 years of opposition, were also found avoiding eye contact with anyone who may ask them why they were tightlipped.

Unlike expectations, Opposition Leader Nisar Ali Khan did not waste time, after playing to the gallery in his famous style of anti-American speech. Nisar knew that his speech against the Americans would help him divert the issue from Swat deal and its implications.

Interestingly Nisar was seen irritated by the story of The News on Monday titled, “Zardari throws the Taliban deal in Nawaz camp” as he loudly referred to it during his speech. “One of our friend (journalist) today has written that now the ball was in PML-N court as the president acted very smartly to ask the Parliament to approve this deal instead of singing it on his own,” he recalled, and then said: “Let me tell everybody that we are ready to share the responsibility.”

He blasted the PPP and said it was not the time to play politics, as he turned his guns towards US Defence Secretary Roberts Gates instead of evaluating the peace deal being struck with the Taliban before asking the house to immediately approve the deal.

PML-Q leader Riaz Pirzada asked who would give guarantees that after this deal, peace would return to the area and militancy would not spread. But PM Gilani remained quiet on this important question, giving an impression that he was given the task to get the deal through Parliament instead of applying his own mind about the future implications as pointed out by some MNAs.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »