by Sheharyar Shaikh
I do not believe that one should boycott anyone from holding a dialogue. One always learns something from an exchange, no matter how abhorrent or deviant their beliefs may be from one’s vantage point. One of the few exceptions I make is in the case of the lay Muslim’s engagement with the Ahmedi missionaries and proselytizers.
This reasoning is similar to the one used by the elders of Mecca, when they advised their folks not to listen to the Holy Prophet pbuh otherwise they will lose their iman in idols whom their forefathers had been idolising.
In fact this has been the tool of all opponents of حق truth to create a wedge between the Prophets and their followers and the people at large. For this reason they even propagated, as recorded by Holy Quran, that the prophets were of unsound mind مجنون (Zaariat 51:53). They had no other option than telling such lies as as they were unable to logically counter the message brought by these prophets.
The mainstream Muslim boycott of the Ahmediyya Jamaat is in the best interest of the Muslims because of its deceptiveness and trickery in getting a lay Muslim to agree to certain points favourable to them in a discussion and its need for Muslims to attend their community events and programs in order to gain legitimacy in the eyes of the wider audience.
Again this reasoning is just the same as was extended by Kuffar-e-Mecca when they boycotted Holy Prophet pbuh and the small Muslim community in Shaib Abi Talib for three years and caused such hardships as a result of which Ummul Momineen Hazrat Khadija ra and Hazrat Abu Talib died soon afterwards.
Holy Quran does not teach boycott. Rather it invites everybody to bring forth arguments if one claims to be true. (Baqra 2:112)
At any major Ahmedi event held in the western countries the overwhelming majority of Ahmedi attendees hail from Pakistan with Sunni Punjabi roots. The Ahmedi missionaries have made deep inroads in convincing the lay Sunni Punjabi Muslims, beyond others, of their version of Islam. Sure, a token Arab or a white Canadian may be seen meandering about in the corner, but it does not change the fact that the Pakistani Punjabis at home or abroad, continue to fill their organizational rank and file.
The comment reflects regional bias and maybe linguistic as well.
Acceptance of truth, being full of hardships and sacrifices, is always a field worth only for brave and courageous. If as per this statement, Sunni Punjabi Muslims have been brave enough in accepting the truth, it is a tribute to them and should be envied. However one should not overlook the inroads made by Ahmadies in Africa, particularly its West Coast, Indonesia and in recent past in Arab world. If Western Ahmadies are still less in number, it is mainly due to West’s indifference to religion.
If the Ahmedi missionaries subject the Pakistani Muslims of small towns and villages to a “pir”-like persona of Ghulam Ahmed, they present a overly pacifist, rational, “science-friendly” Islam to the urban middle class Pakistanis and young professional Muslims overseas. The latter category, often cut off from their religious support and family system, become easy preys.
Ahmadies only present the truth.
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the reformer of the age appointed by God to reform Islam to its original form and to establish its supremacy on all other religions of the world.
Islam in its teachings is rational and as the words of God do not differ with His acts, there cannot be any real conflict between Islam and science. This preaching perhaps can only be objected by those who under rate the Islamic teachings and consider these unfit for modern world.
If then, it attracts ‘young professional Muslims overseas’ there is no need to attribute reasons other than the truth itself.
One thing not brought readily to the table are Mirza Ghulam Ahmed’s bizarre visions, his 20-year obsession with a 14 year old girl, Muhammadi Begam, his absurd religious interpretations, his claims of being 202 historical/honoured figures of other nations (male and female), his use of foul language toward his opponents, vulgarity in his writings, abnormal quirks of behaviour and his unfulfilled prophecies which he presented as evidence of his truth.
Mere accusations. No proof. No support. Funny as well, the age of obsession 20 years and the age of girl only 14. This is a mockery of the sort mentioned in Holy Quran in these words
‘Alas for the men, not a single messenger came to them but they mocked at him’ (Yasin 36:31).
Facts are that Hazrat Sb was a great visionary, aspiring for creation of new spiritual world order to be ruled by his master Hazrat Muhammad pbuh and the Holy Quran. With his passionate love and God gifted knowledge of Holy Quran, he was an unprecedented interpreter of its teachings and successfully reversed the ruthless attack on Islam by Christians and Arias. In the capacity of reformer of age he, under the Divine scheme of things, also fulfilled the prophecies of reformers of later days mentioned in other religions. He was a pious man even in his young age as witnessed by many including Allam Amir Hassan, the beloved teacher of Allama Iqbal. Hazrat Sb. also challenged with prize money if any body can raise a finger on his character, behaviour and personality. Nobody came forward. His prophecies run in thousands which all came true in his life time and many afterwards and still many are in the the process of fulfillment. A few got deferred or fulfilled partially as the concerned persons repented and begged for Allah’s mercy. The prophecy referring a lady was fulfilled to its desired outcome. Three irrefutable facts are: i) The father of the lady Mr. Ahmad Baig, after marrying her elsewhere, died within prescribed period of 3 years. ii) The husband, Mr. Sultan Muhammad, having seen the divine wrath, repented and publicly admitted the truthfulness of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. iii) The son of this pair, Mr.Muhammad Ishaq, admitting the fulfilment of the prophecy, became an Ahmadi.
Of the 86 books Mirza wrote in his lifetime (most of which are rubbish and can be readily read at www.alislam.org) the Muslims are usually presented two works: Mirza’s The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam and Revelation and Rationality, Knowledge and Truth penned by his grandson, Tahir Ahmed (along with a team of helpers and translators).
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was bestowed with Divine knowledge which he extensively spread through his writings.The quality and effect of his great writings has been acknowledged by learned scholars of his time and of later days.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, rightfully stated that the writings of Hazrat will always remain the defense line of Islam against its enemies.
His writings reversed the on going success of Christian missionaries against Islam, taking a toll of at least 200 ulema and prayer leaders of big mosques, alongwith hundreds of thousands of Muslims converting to Christianity, to a humiliating retreat and defeat. This is such an obvious fact that it has to be admitted by all knowledgeable persons as did Dr. Asrar Ahmad in a TV talk show by saying that these writings made Mirza Sb تارا star in the eyes of all Indian Muslims.
The ‘Philosophy of Teachings of Islam’ is of course a jewel in its right. It was a lecture Hazrat Mirza wrote for a religious conference and foretold in a prophecy of God that it will be supreme of all essays to be presented on that occasion. This is a must reading for all who wish to see the beauty of Islamic teachings. Jamaat has therefore translated in almost all important languages of the world.
The Ahmedi missionaries frame the discourse by limiting the discussion to the present status of Jesus – whom the mainstream Muslims believe to have ascended physically into heaven by divine miracle. Whether Mirza Ghulam Ahmed fits the profile of a divinely sent prophet, let alone Jesus is largely neglected. But herein lies the test.
Even if the world accepts Mirza’s half-baked theory of Jesus being taken off the cross, carried to India to live a happily married life with kids and eventually buried there at a ripe age of 120, it still needs to be proven how Mirza the claimant qualifies to be Jesus upon his return. Mirza certainly did not “break the Cross” if that means Christianity’s final annihilation – much as their cult claims. He certainly did not “end all wars”, religious or secular; WWI broke out a few years after his death.
How Hazrat Mirza qualifies to be the Promised Massiah, is a proven fact for anybody who is open to reason. It is apparent by his great personality reflecting attributes of Allah خدا نما وجود , by his innumerable prayers granted by Allah, by his hundreds of thousands fulfilled prophecies, by the help and support extended by Allah to him throughout his life and after him to his successors, by the spiritual revolution he brought in his followers, by the impact his holy person had on people all over the world, by the selfless services and sacrifices his followers are rendering for last 123 years now reaching to the 5th/6th generation of his companions and the great acceptance and unmatched success Allah has granted to these humble efforts by spreading his message to the corners of the world.
This can be proved by applying on him all علامات signs mentioned symbolically in Holy Quran and Ahadees about the second advent of Hazrat Isa.
Irrespective of his many manifestations i.e. Ummati Nabi, Masih Mauood and Imam Mehdi, the basic status and claim of Hazrat Mirza Sb is مامور من اللہ, a God appointed reformer. Such claim is not new. Holy Quran mentions about 28 such claimants. At times Quran also gives arguments in support of their claims. The truth of Hazrat Mirza Sb, being one of the same clan, can be verified against any rather all such arguments mentioned in Holy Quran through which the truthfulness of any previous nabi is established.
Hazrat Mirza did break the Cross.
The Christianity is based on its beliefs of Trinity and atonement کفارہ . By the logical reasoning and heap of arguments put forth by Hazrat sb about Jesus coming alive from cross and later dieing a natural death, both these beliefs come to ground. Holy Quran has already established this principal that ‘he who would perish might perish by clear proof, and he who would live might live by clear proof’ ( Anfal 8:43).
With the spread and acceptance of these facts Christianity will come to an end as admitted in the documentary aired on BBC about tomb of Jesus in Kashmir.
The mention of end of wars was for religion. Like Jesus, Hazrat also was for peace and friendship. He forbade from taking arms for spread of religion and to attack those who are not stopping the practice and preaching of Islam by force. He also prophesied that use of force for these purposes will not succeed any more. We all witness the fullfilment of this prophecy. Wars for worldly reasons is a different area. These wars have always been there. In fact Hazrat was told by God Almighty of five great human tragedies to occur in future. According to these prophecies 1st and 2nd World wars have already taken place and 3rd is not far off.
One thing the Ahmediyya Jamaat never reveals on its own is the official status of the 1.5 billion Muslims from its point of view. Whereas they express much furor over being ostracised from the mainstream Muslim community, they hide the fact that it is their leaders who declared the mainstream Muslims as infidels for rejecting Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (May Allah deal with him) as a prophet.
A review of the quoted words and phrases with context will be enough to repudiate the created wrong impression.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed unequivocally called his non-followers (Muslims): “non-Muslims” (tazkira-e majmu’a-e ilhamat, pg. 600),
In 3rd edition of Tazkira on pg.601 a Persian revelation from God الہام appears. Its wording are چو دور خسروی آغاز کردند مسلماں را مسلماں باز کردند . It means that with the inception of age of Masih Mauood the Muslims in name will be converted to real Muslims.
The concept of a person being an apparent Muslim but not real one is Quranic as per following verse:
‘The Beduins say, we believe. Say thou, you have not believed but say, we obey, and faith has not entered your hearts.’(Hujrat 49:15).
In the quoted revelation of Hazrat both are also named Muslims. Hence the allegation that all Muslims are dubbed as ‘non-Muslims’ is not correct: “complete kafir(s)” (infidels) (Kalimatul-fasl, p. 110)
There is no book written by Hazrat titled Kalimatul-fasl. Hence this quote is wrongly attributed to him.
“bastards” (walad ul-haram) (Anwar ul-Islam, pg. 30, RK vol. 9, pg. 31)
The discussion, on this page of the book Anwar-ul-Islam, in context of which this word is used is that Hazrat Sb was persuading a Christian missionary Mr. Abdullah Atham, who had just escaped the wrath of Allah by refraining during the period of prophecy from his notorious utterances against Islam and Holy Prophet pbuh, to state on oath that he had not inclined towards the truth of Islam during this period. He further wrote that if Mr. Atham did not opt for this course of action and still somebody جو شخص claims victory for Christians it will be assumed that he likes اس کو شوق ہے to become ولدالحرام .
It is apparent that to attribute this statement to Muslims, instead of the local Christian supporters of this missionary, is incorrect and misleading: “children of whores” (dhuriyyat ul-baghayaa) (A’ina-e Kamalat-e Islam, pg 547-548, RK vol. 5, pg. 547-548)
This compound phrase ذریت البغایا used in an Arabic writing of Hazrat sb means sinful and rebellious. To consider its constituent words individually and then to put their translations as one phrase is simply against the rules of the language. There are other similar phrases in Arabic e.g. ابن الدینار ،ابن السبیل ، ابن الوقت which when translated separately mean ‘son of time, son of passage and son of money’ but in phrase mean cunning, traveller and greedy respectively. Even school going children know that individual words used in an idiom / phrase may mean any thing but the idiom itself will have different meaning. That is why it is funny to translate میرا دل باغ باغ ہو گیا as my heart became garden and garden.
Why people claiming to be literate should do such tricks?
Maybe just because out of enmity of Ahamdiyyat and with the bad intention to persuade illiterates to hate Ahamdies: “swines… and their women have become worse than bitches” (Najm ul-Huda, pg. 53, RK vol. 14, pg. 53).
The missing part of this partial translation of a couplet of an Arabic poem is the object of these words. This omission seems purposeful because without having done this it was not possible to deceitfully attribute these words to ‘non-followers (Muslims). These omitted words are ‘our enemies who abused’ ہمارے دشمن جنہوں نے گالیاں دیں .
So these words are used not at all for non-followers Muslims, not for everybody, but for those select enemies who vehemently abused Islam, Holy Quran and Holy Prophet pbuh and Hazrat. He in his book کتاب البریہ has recorded some of these abuses. (Kitab-ul-Bariea RK Vol.13, pg.119-152). Any reader of this slander will perhaps desire to use even harsher words than used by Hazrat in this couplet.
Again one will question the motive for this open deceit and hate mongering . Answer perhaps is same.To incite and inflame uneducated Muslim masses against Ahamdies by misdirecting their feelings of love for Holy Prophet pbuh.
So much for the “Love for all, hatred for none” slogan.
The use of harsh words, when needed, is only a factual statement. Holy Quran at times had named the specific non believers as ‘apes’ بندر (Maida 5:61), ‘swine’ سوءر (Maida 5:61), ‘dog’ (Aaraf 7:177), ‘vilest of animals’ جانوروں میں بد ترین (Anfal 8:56), ‘illegitimate’ ولد الزنا (Qalam 68:14), ‘asses’ گدھے (Muddasir 74:51), ‘worst of creatures’ مخلوقات میں بد ترین (Bayyinah 98:7).
New Testament also records similar expressions used for their opponents by Hazrat Isa. A few examples are ‘dogs’ (Matthew 7:6), ‘swine’ (Matthew 7:6), ‘evil and adulterous generation’ برے اور زنا کار (Matthew 12:39)), ‘satan’ شیطان (Matthew 16:23)), ‘serpents’ سانپ (Matthew 24:33), ‘generation of vipers’ سانپوں کی اولاد (Matthew 24:33), ‘son of devil’ ابلیس کی اولاد (John 8:44)۔
If then Hazrat has of necessity used harsh words for a few deserving, there is nothing new and it does not affect his overwhelming love for humanity and the slogan “Love for all, hatred for none”.
If there was ever a hope of turning to true Islam, Ghulam Ahmed’s son and a spiritual authority of the Ahmedis made clear that “(Ghulam Ahmed) has instructed us in detail that we differ with (the rest of the Muslims) in each and every thing (in Islam).” (Khutba-e Mirza Mahmud, al-Fazl, v.19, pg. 13). Moreover, he called it a “fard” (religious obligation) to consider all Muslims as “infidels” (Anwar-e Khilafat, 70). This even includes their “six month old babies” (Paygham-e Sulh, vol. 24, No. 49, August 3, 1936). Mahmud Ahmed went on to declare that those Muslims who have not given allegiance to Ghulam Ahmed are “infidels (kafirs) and out of the pale of Islam, even if they have not heard the very name of Maseeh Ma’ud (i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed)” (Aina-e Sadaqat, pg. 35).
The true meaning of these out of context hand-picked phrases is surely not what these are given to portray and can be explained individually. (There is no book titled Payghame Sulh written by the son of Hazrat Sb and hence a reference attributed to him is incorrect). However as a simple way we can just refer to the explanation given by the writer, the second successor of Hazrat, himself in 1953 enquiry court and published by Jamaat.
In reply to the question what he considers of the Muslims who do not believe in Mirza sb. he explained the difference in the meaning of words Muslim and Momin as used by Holy Quran and then stated that ‘nobody can be called a non-Muslim by not accepting the Holy founder of Ahmaiyyat. As prophesied by Holy Prophet pbuh they will continue to be Muslims for name sake. As many scholars including, Maulvi Maudoodi, Maulana Siddiq Hasan Khan, Allama Iqbal, Maulana Haali, have declared them to be.
Another question was if a non-believer is infidel کافر ? In reply he explained that words کافر and non-believer are synonymous. So such person will be a kafir of Hazrat, but again he will not be out of pale of Ummat-e-Muhammadia.
However for those non-believers who consider Ahmadies as kafir following principal specified by Holy Prophet pbuh will apply:
‘When somebody names his brother as kafir then one of the two will be a kafir. If the person who is dubbed as kafir is not then the accuser will be a kafir.’ (Sahih Muslim).
Historically ulema were first in calling Hazrat Mirza Sb and his followers as kafir. So the status of these ulema and their followers was obvious in view of the above tradition of Holy prophet pbuh. This explains the use of this term in some writings of Hazrat sb.
Now comes the point of how to deal with the Ahmediyya Jamaat, especially in the west. The overall best policy for the Muslims is to not deal with them at all, unless strictly for da’wah conducted by those who are acquainted with this cult’s vile agenda. It neither is, nor ever will be inshaAllah a serious threat to the global Muslim community. Our organization was approached many times to hold debates with them, and let it be known that we are always ready to hold a debate so long as it is public.
Against the normal response of entering into a dialogue to understand others’ viewpoint and to ascertain truth, ‘not to at all deal’ has always been considered ‘best policy’ by the addresses of Prophets of Allah. Holy Quran has recorded this response but also disapproves it, as stated:
‘And they say, our hearts are enclosed. Nay, God has deprived them of His blessing on account of their disbelief’. (Baqrah 2:89).
‘Vile agenda?’ Ahmadies have an open agenda from day one. Hazrat saw in a vision creating a new world and a new heaven. We are after it. To make this world a heaven of peace and tranquility, Holy Quran being its law and the Holy Prophet pbuh being its saviour. This agenda can only be ‘vile’ for enemies of Islam.
As regards your readiness ‘to hold debate’, what about placing this response on your website and let this discussion continue in this fashion?
With reference to the upcoming conference on the Prophet (s) to occur in the Roy Thompson Hall on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012, (for which we have so far received 4 invitation cards, 2 email invitations, a letter by mail and personal invites), I strongly advise the Muslims not to attend it. The purpose behind the event is to to attract the naïve Muslims to their ground for possible conversions by posing themselves as the foremost “defenders” of the Prophet (s)’s honor. Secondly, it is to present themselves as peaceloving Muslims to the Canadians so as to win their sympathies and support.
You and all those who did not attend the function under your (ill)advise have missed a great opportunity. By the Grace of Allah, Jama’at Ahmadiyya Canada was able to arrange a world-class gathering to highlight the noble person of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). The Around 2500 Non Muslims and Non Ahmadi Muslims attended this great event.
Against the alleged ‘purpose behind the event’ this historic effort of Jamaat Ahamdiyya Canada was an expression of our love for our master and the most honorable human ever being. It was also a true response to counter the attempts of blasphemy by the misguided against Hazrat Muhammad pbuh. To judge for yourself you may please view the proceedings from the following link.
www.theprophet.ca
Of course had they cared for the Prophet’s honor they would have rejected Ghulam Ahmed who claimed equality with or superiority over the Prophet (s) in the following words :
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad always placed himself as a humble servant of Holy Prophet pbuh. He repeatedly mentioned that all his spiritual exaltation was only because he was an Ummati of Hazrat Muhamamd pbuh and his dutiful disciple. He once said that even if his good deeds have equaled mountains he would have not got any status had he not been a follower of Hazrat Muhamamd pbuh. All otherwise allegations of claiming equality or superiority are therefore false and incorrect.
“..I am Muhammad (pbuh)” (tatimma-e Haqiqat ul-Wahi, pg. 521)
As always this reference is tampered and the words that follow and clarify earlier are deliberately omitted. These words are یعنی بروزی طور پر ‘that is to say in appearance of his attributes’. This is in accordance with the Quranic prophecy of second coming of Hazrat Muhammad pbuh mentioned in following verses
‘It is He who has raised up amongst an unlettered people a messenger from amongst themselves…… And to others from among them who have not joined them yet, (Jumah 62:3-4)
“I have been declared the very being (وجود ) of Muhammad (Ek Ghalti ka Izala, pg. 10)
These words are preceded by the above Quranic verse and followed by these explanatory words میں ظلی طور پر محمد ہوں ‘I am a reflection of Muhammad’. Now a reflection can never be equal to the original.
“Whosoever differentiates between me and Mustafa (s) has neither seen me – nor recognized me” (Khutba ilhamiyah, pg. 171)
These words precede following sentence پس وہ جو میری جماعت میں داخل ہوا درحقیقت میرے سردار خیرالمرسلین کے صحابہ میں داخل ہوا۔اور یہی معنی آخرین منہم کے لفظ کے بھی ہین۔
To refer to Holy Prophet as ‘my master’ negates any thoughts of equality or superiority.
And no, he is not “Muhammad (pbuh)” who is greater in glory than ever before in the form of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (آگے سے بڑھکر ہيں اپنی شان مي ) (Badr Qadyan, 25 October, 1906, pg. 14).
This reference from a poem of an Ahmadi poet having no authority in Jamaat carries no weight. Further the second successor of Hazrat sb reprimanded the poet and stated that these words are نا پسند یدہ اور بے ادبی کے ہیں unacceptable and of disrespect. This statement appeared in Alfazal, 19 Aug 1934 i.e. 78 years back and still it is being used for the ulterior motives.
How shameful it is that the Acting Consul General of Pakistan in Toronto, Imran Ali, has emailed all Pakistani-Canadians “requesting” them to make “the (Ahmedi) event a success” – this too from his official capacity! Subhannallah, to my knowledge the Consul General Imran Ali has never officially promoted any mainstream Muslim event, let alone for a cult that heavily relies on obtaining immigration visas to Canada based on false claims and smearing Pakistan’s image. I have heard the Ahmediyya leadership vilify Pakistan before non-Muslim attendees during their Ahmediyya conference at University of Waterloo. What I have not heard is their use of “Zindabad”(long live) for Pakistan at their events as they routinely do for others.
And here is the Consul General of Pakistan Imran Ali so concerned to promote an Ahmediyya event that he even asks us to “invite fellow Canadians” to it. I can just see the Ahmediyya leadership ‘high fiving’ each other to be able to so easily exploit such a gullible and incompetent diplomat; a cult he called “Muslim” in the email – perhaps not knowing or caring that the Ahmediyya Jamaat has a non-Muslim status in the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan which he represents.
Article 260 of the Constitution of Pakistan states:
A person who does not believe in the absolute and unequal finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him), the last of the Prophets or claims to be a prophet in any sense of the word or of any description whatsoever, after Muhammad (peace be upon him), or recognize such a claimant as a prophet or a religious reformer, is not a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitutional Law.
The Application for Pakistani passport contains the following declaration:
DECLARATION (FOR MUSLIMS ONLY)
I do not recognize any person who claims to be a prophet in any sense of the word or of any description what so ever after Muhammad (peace be upon him) or recognize such a claimant as prophet or religious reformer as a Muslim. I consider Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani to be an imposter nabi and also consider his followers, whether belonging to the Lahori or Qadiani group to be non Muslims.
Please write to Imran Ali Chaudhary expressing your disappointment at imranali@pakmission.ca or call him at 647-821-7166.
You need to remind Imran Ali albeit with respect that his responsibility as Consul General is to improve consular services of Pakistan in Toronto, for which he is paid for by the taxpayers, and certainly not to promote Ahmediyya events in his official capacity. Jazakallah khayr.
The above mostly concerns the Consul General of Pakistan who seems to be an unbiased dutiful person and perhaps for this reason is being targeted by the writer who is all for promoting hatred. I have all my sympathy with Mr. Imran Ali and wish him good luck and pray that Allah may grant him courage to withstand these hatemongers.
Interestingly the writer has quoted an article from constitution of Pakistan declaring Ahmadies as not-Muslims and also a declaration for passport requiring any claimant to be a Muslim to first abuse Hazrat Miarza Ghulam Ahmad and still has the guts to complain having not heard Pakistan Zindabad from those Ahamdies who are forced by these circumstances to leave their homeland and settled in Canada!
Sheharyar Shaikh is the former President of North American Muslim Foundation. He is currently the Imam of Masjid Qurtabah. He specializes in Quranic exegesis with contemporary Islamic thought and modernity
To SUBSCRIBE to or UNSUBSCRIBE from this list please email us at namf@bellnet.ca
www.namf.ca
North American Muslim Foundation was established in 1975 as federally registered charitable foundation dedicated to helping the community for a better tomorrow.
Filed under: Islam | Tagged: Ahmedi Defense, Islam, Islam & Ahmedis, Minorities in Pakistan, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed & Prohpethood, Pakistan | Leave a Comment »
Ever wondered why Muslims are so powerless?
