Archive for Missing Persons in Pakistan

When Will the Judiciary Start to Confront State Agencies about the Missing Persons

Pakistan is seeing little progress in the hundreds of missing person’s cases still pending. Pakistanis continue to be regularly ‘disappeared’ after arrest.

With the police force exposed as increasingly negligent and corrupt, the responsibility of identifying such cases and intervening has long fallen to the judiciary. Judges taking suo moto action is widely believed to have been a major motive behind the sacking of the Supreme Court judges in 2007 by Musharraf.

Yet despite the restoration of the Judiciary with its Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in March after a long civil struggle and with the support of current Chief of Army Staff General Kiyani, there has been a marked decline in the response from the courts to appeals from the family of the missing.

Leading figureheads in the lawyers’ movement, such as Mr. Ali
Ahmed Kurd, former president of Supreme Court Bar Association, have been renewing their criticism of its performance. The change has been raising questions about the court’s allegiance to civil society versus its sense of obligation to his supporters in the army.

In response to this institutional indifference, family members of the missing have taken to camping outside the Supreme Court complex in protest. The court recently relented to one group, stationed there from 2 to 17 November, and assured them that the fate of their loved ones would be examined and their cases tried. But the judges involved have since done little more than make clichéd remarks about the ultimate good of the Supreme Court, while showing no willingness to flex the judicial muscle; suspected perpetrators from the state agencies have not been called or held to account. The proceedings are, in fact, starting to resemble a publicity stunt.

Over the past few years the court has heard from various persons who were arrested illegally by intelligence agents and who were tortured in covert military torture cells for months at a time; more than enough to paint a convincing picture. On this basis alone, as people continue to vanish after arrest, the court is obliged to pursue the issue to the very extent of its ability.

The most prominent case of state abduction is that of three political activists from the Balochistan province who were kidnapped on April 3; they were taken from a lawyers’ office by plain clothed officials in one of the state’s conspicuous white vans. Their bodies were found six days later (http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3145/)
The lawyer and other eye witnesses are willing to testify, but the
courts are not looking into the case.

The most recent case brought to attention is the struggle of a couple in Punjab to ensure a credible investigation into the disappearance of their son, who vanished during a hospital transfer under the custody of police tp://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3306).

NGOs have estimated that during the current civilian government around 100 persons have gone missing after their arrest, and efforts to uncover their fate have mostly led nowhere.

Political groups in Balochistan have reported that out of the 4,000 supposedly arrested there, not more than 200 have been brought to trial in courts and the remainder are unaccounted for, out of the reach of their relatives or lawyers.

The Supreme Court itself has more than 400 cases of disappeared persons pending.

Though statistics may vary, the size of the problem is beyond dispute.

Enforced disappearances thrive in societies with ill-functioning,
dependent judiciaries, which fail to hold state agents accountable for their actions. Under autocratic governments and military regimes a nation’s judges become markedly subordinate, and these are the issues Pakistan continues to struggle with.

Leave a Comment

Balochistan: A Student Leader Goes Missing

The Asian Human Rights Commission has received information that a
student activist has been arrested by members of a military
intelligence agency, and his whereabouts are still unknown.

!cid_image015Another female student has been fined and sentenced to three years in prison on sedition charges by the Anti Terrorism Court for heading a demonstration against disappearances.

The cases show that harsh crackdowns on free speech, association and assembly continue in Balochistan, contrary to the claims of its democratically elected government.

According to information from the Baloch Students Organisation-Azad) , activist student Mr. Zakir Majeed was allegedly abducted by intelligence agents on June 8, 2009 in Mastung, near Quetta. Majeed is the senior vice chairperson of the Baloch Student Organization-Azad (BSO) and was with two other members, Waheed Baloch and Basit Baloch, near a busy marketplace at around noon when they were stopped by plain-clothed men. The men, who had driven
up in two cars without number plates, asked a few questions and said
that they were intelligence agents working for the Pakistan army.
They took Majeed away with them in the cars without making any
charges. One car was a Toyota Vego, the other a Toyota Surf SSR.

Meanwhile postgraduate student Miss Karima Baloch, 23, has just been sentenced to three years in prison and fined Rs 150,000 (US$ 1,875) after she and several other women demonstrated in August 2006 against disappearances. The charges were made in her absence since she has yet to be found and arrested, and they were based mainly upon the removal of a flag from a government building without authorisation (under section 123 B of Pakistan penal code). She has been charged with defiling the flag and with sedition, which under section 124 A of PPC means whoever by words or by sign or by visible representation excite(s) disaffection towards the federal or provincial government.

The sentence was given by the Anti Terrorist Court (ATC) in Turbat,
Balochistan province on June 2, 2009.

Karima Baloch has had personal experience with the disappearances she campaigned against. One of her uncles, Mr.Abdul Wahid Qamber Baloch, was arrested in March 2007, tortured and kept incommunicado in secret military cells for nine months. He was handed over to police on April 21, 2008 and acquitted of nine out of ten changes, but remains in custody charged with anti-state activities. Another of her uncles, Dr. Khalid Baloch, was killed in August 2007 in an alleged encounter, in which the Frontier Corps (FC), a paramilitary organisation, claimed to have been ambushed.

According to reports by journalists and rights groups, encounter killings are often staged in Balochistan as a wayof ridding the authorities of unwanted detainees. Considering the circumstances it is unsurprising that the student has not come forward for her sentence.

There is also widespread doubt regarding the validity of rulings made
by the Anti Terrorism Court which was set up under former president
Musharraf. The court is notorious for its harsh judgments which are regularly overturned by the high court, and have often been followed by the accused disappearing into military custody regardless.

The BSO lobbies for the basic rights of the Baloch people in Pakistan, and is thought to be the largest platform for students critical of military action there. At the moment this mineral-rich province is experiencing its fifth large scale military operation since 1947, which has lasted eight years. Though the civilian government of President Zardari has stated that military operations were stopped when the new government was democratically elected in 2008, forces are still stationed there, military quarters continue to be built and reports of wide spread human rights abuse, particularly by the paramilitary Frontier Corps, constantly leave the province. These include the disappearances of over 350 persons after their arrest since Zardari came into power and about 4,000 in total, since military operations began.

(Please see previous AHRC reports on disappearances and secret military torture centres: AHRC-UAC-041-2009
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3145/, AHRC-STM-012-2009
http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2009/3145/ Majeed was a member of the committee that worked for the release of victims of abduction.

Leave a Comment

PPP Fails to Act to Address Disappearances & Extra-Judicial

A written statement submitted by the Asian Legal Resource Centre
(ALRC), a non-governmental organisation with general consultative
status

GuantanamoThe government of Pakistan is failing to take credible steps to probe
cases of disappearances that have been ongoing for decades in the
country. The government is not taking effective action to address
this significant human rights problem, despite calls from members of
the UN and its Human Rights Council (HRC) to do so, notably during
the country’s Universal Periodic review (UPR) in May 2008. 

The Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) has repeatedly brought the problem of disappearances in Pakistan, which has amongst the highest numbers of such cases in Asia, to the attention of the Council.
In response to a letter from the UNHRC, which was engaged in attempting to obtain the release of the UNHCR’s John Solecki, who had been abducted, the Prime Minister announced the formation of a probe committee on the issue of disappearances. The committee consisted of the government of Pakistan’s Secretary of the Interior, the government of Balochistan province’s Secretary of the Interior, the Director of the Federal Investigation Agency, the representative of the Constabulary (a paramilitary force) and the Inspector General of Police, Balochistan province. The committee started its investigations in March.

The members of Pakistan’s ‘probe committee’ have, however, reportedly threatened victims, witnesses and their family members including children, who were either providing testimony or offering to do so about the disappearances of people following arrest by the state intelligence agencies. For example, in the first week of April 2009, three such the witnesses were abducted from the office of their lawyer and were later killed.

Five persons, who were disappeared after their arrests and who were kept in military detention centres for many months before being release, have provided evidence concerning their incommunicado detention and torture in military cells for several months. The witnesses complained of being threatened by committee members who told them that it was known where the witnessed lived, where their children were studying and how many females members there are in their families. After participating on four occasions in the probe committee hearings the witnesses complained that they realised the hostile attitude of the committee members and decided not to attend any further sessions.

On April 3, one day before the release of Mr. John Solecki, three nationalist leaders of Balochistan, Mr. Ghulam Mohammad, 45, Chairman of the Baloch National Movement, Mr. Sher Mohammad Baloch, 35, Vice President of the Balochistan Republican Party and Mr. Lala Munir Baloch, 50, General Secretary of the Baloch National Front, were abducted from the office of their lawyer in Turbat district. Their mutilated bodies, which bore the signs of torture, were found on April 6 in the same district. Mr Ghulam Mohammad, who attended the meetings of the probe committee, was threatened on several occasions by the members of the committee. The other two victims had also been kept incommunicado in military torture cells for almost 11 months.

The three nationalists killed under mysterious circumstances after their arrest, allegedly by Military Intelligence, were the prime witnesses who had reported to the courts and the media about the disappearances and torture in military torture cells and their murders are nothing less than the silencing of witnesses. The forced disappearance of political opponents which are attributed to the state intelligence services continues in spite of the newly elected government’s claims that they will swiftly deal with this problem. Since the PPP came to power one year ago, no serious or credible steps have been taken to address these disappearances. The state intelligence agencies are operating in opposition to the government’s efforts. In fact, since April 2008 and during the first year of the newly elected government, more than 350 persons have been disappeared after arrest. Meanwhile officers of the state intelligence agencies claim that they have been excused from the obligation of attending courts to give evidence due to reasons of national security.

 The Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) and Military Intelligence (MI) agencies are suspected by the families of the disappeared of carrying out the arrest and disappearances of more than 4,000 persons since the start of the ‘war on terror’. In the first nine months of the PPP’s government only around a dozen people who were abducted have resurfaced. Certain religious organisations claim that more than 23 persons belonging to various religious groups, mostly young students, are still missing after their arrest.

Two months after the commencement of the probe committee it appears that all inquiries have ceased. The possibility of credible and transparent inquiries seems unlikely. Despite the assurances of the present government to the United Nations, the international community and the people of Pakistan, the disappearances of thousands of persons remain unresolved and the authorities are not making the required efforts to locate their whereabouts.

Recommendations
The lack of credible steps by the government to address disappearances and extra-judicial killings is fostering impunity and engendering the continuing scourge of these grave violations. Given the deteriorating security situation in the country, forced disappearances and extra-judicial killings attributable to the State are likely to rise given this, further fuelling an already dangerous
situation.

The Human Rights Council is urged to condemn the use of forced disappearance, which is habitually accompanied by torture and extra-judicial killing in the country, and urge the government to ratify and implement the core international human rights instruments, including the ICCPR and the International Convention on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, in line with repeated calls from civil society, international experts and several States during the UPR. Pakistan should also issue standing invitations to all special procedures and invite the Special Rapporteurs on Torture, Extra-judicial killings and the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, as a priority.

The government of Pakistan is strongly urged to establish a functioning, credible and independent body to investigate disappearances, torture and extra-judicial killings. All inquiries it conducts should be open, transparent and the media should have access to report on such proceedings. If the witnesses are to come forward to give evidence appropriate measures must be taken to provide them with adequate protection. The complaints of witnesses who claim that they were threatened by some member of the present probe committee also need to be seriously investigated.

——————————-
About the ALRC: The Asian Legal Resource Centre is an independent regional NGO holding general consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. It
is the sister organisation of the Asian Human Rights Commission. The Hong Kong-based group seeks to strengthen and encourage positive action on legal and human rights issues at the local and national levels throughout Asia.
—————————–
Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) – 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) – 2698-6367

Leave a Comment

What to Do with the Guantanamo Bay Detainees?

p-bushs-olympics-high-15

 

Among the long to-do-list of ‘unresolved’ issues that President George W. Bush will hand over to his successor Barrack Obama on January 20, 2009, and which include two very expensive wars that continue, are the 248 Guantanamo Bay detainees about which the US government is in a conundrum what to do. Of the over 200 detainees, about 60 have been cleared for release and between 150-200, according to lawyers, have no case, but cannot be repatriated to their native countries for fear of being victimized, tortured or killed, and who, no other country is not willing to accept. And why should they, it’s a mess of US’ own making and it alone should be responsible for it.

Seven years on, when the first 20 prisoners were flown in from Afghanistan on January 11, 2002, in orange jumpsuits, that grew to 779 as the “war on terror” picked up pace, the debate has suddenly shifted from whether the detention facilities be closed to “how”. The new Obama adminsitration will have to come up with a plan that can resolve the legal, diplomatic, polictial and logistical challenges towards closing this prison’s gates, which will remain an ugly stain on the US, of the shameful incarceration policies pursued by the Bush administration.

In the last eight years, if there was one rights issue that stood up like a sore thumb during the Bush rule and caused much discomfiture, it has been the stream of reports of human rights abuse on inmates languishing in small metal cages in Camp X-Ray. As his term approached its end, the Bush administration was fervently seen trying to dispose of these prisoners. It succeeded by sending 500 prisoners either to their home countries or to third-party countries.

Guantanamo’s days are numbered and that’s a given. All words and deeds by President-elect Barrack Obama seem to point towards its closure at the Cuban naval base. While closing the detention centre may be easier said than done, the fact that this decision has been taken augurs well for the new US president and his administration.  If he closes the detention faciltiies, should it be assumed that it will put an end to the widely discredited military commissions? Will the cases then be transferred to the US federal courts? Will these prisoners who have no cases be set free? Where will they be repatriated to?

Following these plans, Gates had also suggested a legislation that would block released detainees from seeking asylum in the US. But that could be because of the 17 Chinese Uighurs whose fate stands in a limbo. Living in a camp in Afghanistan having fled from China, these men were detained by Pakistani authorities who handed them over to the US some seven years ago, following the US invasion there, probably for bounty. They are no longer considered “enemy combatants” by the US military but the US cannot send them to China, which the latter has demanded, for fear of persecution. Since no country will accept them, it is quite likely that US will take them in.

The most dangerous detainees, between 30 and 80, and of which Khaled Sheikh Mohammad is one, will be tried in the US, it is learnt. But the trick will be to build this case anew and not from evidence obtained through torture.

On December 18, the heads of four prominent civil liberties and human rights organizations — the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Amnesty International USA, Human Rights First, and Human Rights Watch sent a letter to Barack Obama reminding the President-elect to fulfill his pledge. It said Obama should implement “an unqualified return to America’s established system of justice for detaining and prosecuting suspects” and not create an on-shore Guantanamo.

The letter also described how the new administration should resolve the Guantanamo mess. After stepping into the Oval Office, President Obama should immediately set a date for Gitmo’s closure, it said. Next, suggested the letter, a fresh review of all detainee records by the Justice Department be conducted to determine which cases require legitimate evidence of criminal activity. Where no such evidence is found the detainees should be repatriated to their home countries for trial or release. If there is a risk of torture or abuse, they should be transferred to third countries that will accept them or be admitted to the United States. Where there is proof of criminal activity, detainees should be prosecuted in the federal courts.

In a report tiltled “Closing Guantanamo: From Bumper Sticker to Blueprint” by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, that came out in September 2008, the CSIS drew a similar roadmap for the president to pursue. Witness Against Torture, a campaign to shut down Guantanamo with activists dressed in orange jumpsuits, is launching a 100 Day Campaign, starting from January 20 to April30, 2009, to pressure the new administration to close Guantanamo. “At the end of the 100 days we hope to celebrate both the closure of the detention facility at Guantanamo and the adoption of polices and laws that decisively ban torture by the US government.”

But is Pakistan also bracing itself for these prisoners if the US releases them or has it already asked for their repatriation? According to a study by Washington DC-based nonprofit public policy organization, the Brookings Institution, they are: Majid Khan, Saifullah Paracha and two brothers, Abdul Rahim Ghulam Rabbani and Muhammad Ahmed Ghulam Rabbani. If it accepts the four gentlemen, has it developed any plans about what it would do with them? Those who have not been tried in Cuba, will they have to face trial here? Will they be further incarcerated? What form of trial will be used – will they be tried in civilian courts or will special commissions be set up? Will it be on a case-by-case basis? Will it be decided by the parliament or the Interior Ministry?

Having been put through years of incarceration without being charged, and subjected to worst forms of abuse, has the government thought of providing these people with some long-term psychological counseling if they need it? Have their families been informed and the good news shared to prepare them for a possible re-union? It’s time the PPP-led government made public its policy towards the process to deal with these detainees.

For now, the only message coming from the government is that it will accept all the detainees (the government has counted up to five) and has been consistent in its demand, said its foreign ministry. “The Government of Pakistan has urged the U.S. authorities to facilitate their repatriation to Pakistan as soon as possible,” was the indifferent statement coming from the foreign ministry. The how and what it has in mind for their repatriation, is something they has not been planned in “micro detail”, Farhatullah Babar informed this scribe.

Comments (1)

Pakistan Army Generals Kayani and Majid Could be Assassinated: Asia

cid_32232307154web56604mailre3
 http://www.SyedAdeeb.net ttp://www.InformPress.com

(ATimes.com) – Asia Times, a daily newspaper based in Hong Kong, has pointed out in its news report of 21 November 2008, headlined “The U.S. Strikes Deeper in Pakistan”, written by Asia Times Online’s Pakistan Bureau Chief Syed Saleem Shahzad, that Pakistan Army
Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani and Army’s JCSC Chairman, General
Tariq Majid, could be assassinated like Army’s SSG Commander, Major
General (R) Amir Faisal Alavi, and Army’s Surgeon General, Lt. General
Mushtaq Ahmed Baig. The militants accuse them of harming innocent
Pakistanis, Afghans and Muslims in Pakistan.

The Asia Times news report states: “Clearly, under Pakistan’s Army
Chief, General Ashfaq Kayani – currently in Brussels for talks with North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] officials – highly sensitive information is now being relayed to the U.S. This has dangerous implications.

“As a possible portend of things to come in this new phase of urban
warfare, on Nov 26, a trusted member of Musharraf’s former team, retired Major General Amir Faisal Alavi, former commander of the elite commando unit Special Service Group (SSG), was assassinated by a group of armed men in Islamabad.

“As Chief of the Army and president, Musharraf, who had also been a member of the SSG, maintained a close relationship with Alavi. Alavi retired two years ago but was credited with masterminding the Angor Ada operation in 2004, when many Arabs and Chechans based in the tribal areas were killed or arrested and turned over to the Americans.

“Other key figures who have participated in these operations could be next on the hit list. These include Army boss Kayani, who previously
served as the Director General of military operations, Corps Commander
Rawalpindi and as Director General of the Intelligence Services. The present Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Tariq Majid, was the architect of the Lal Masjid (Red Mosque) operation in 2007 in which the [red] mosque was stormed by troops. He was then Corps Commander Rawalpindi.”

(Independent.co.uk) – The following news report published in The
Independent daily newspaper of London, UK, on 24 November 2008,
headlined “How U.S. Plotted to Get UK’s Most Wanted Terrorist – Heads
of American and Pakistani Security Colluded in Plot to Kill Rashid Rauf”, written by The Independent’s Asia correspondents Kim Sengupta and Andrew Buncombe, points out that the state functionaries may be involved.

A secret meeting on board an American aircraft carrier between the U.S. General David Petraeus and the head of the Pakistani military laid the foundation for the killing of Britain’s most wanted suspect.

The Independent learnt that talks held on board the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Persian Gulf three months ago led to General Kayani pledging to provide information on “high-value” targets such as Rashid Rauf, who died in a missile strike inside Pakistan on Saturday. Senior UK security sources insisted that the lethal attack in North Waziristan on the 27-year-old Birmingham-born Rauf – accused of being involved in the plot to plant liquid bombs aboard transatlantic airliners – was “a unilateral American
action” without any British involvement.

The disclaimer came after two senior MPs called on the British government to say whether or not it had been made aware in advance of the attack plan. Andrew Dismore, Labour chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights, said: “We can investigate whether British security services had involvement in providing intelligence concerning British nationals in Pakistan.” The former shadow security minister Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP for Newark, said: “This raises the question of how much co-operation the British intelligence agencies provided in … the execution of a British subject.”

However, American officials stated that the intelligence on the whereabouts of Rauf and a Saudi [Muslim], Abu Zubair al-Masri, was provided by Pakistani authorities. The agreement on sharing intelligence came during the meeting on the aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea in the last week of August, U.S. sources said. General Kayani, who had taken over from Musharraf as the head of the Pakistani military, was brought to the ship by American helicopters. He was told about grave American disquiet over the help being given to the militants by the Pakistani military and intelligence service, the ISI. According to US officials an agreement was reached at the conclusion of the “heated” meeting with General Kayani, in which the Pakistanis General
Kayani and ISI DG Lt. General Ahmed Shuja Pasha promised to supply
high-quality intelligence.

Rauf was initially wanted for questioning by police in England over the murder of his uncle in Birmingham. He fled to Pakistan but was arrested in August 2006 by the Pakistani police for his alleged involvement in the airliner plot. But in December 2007 he escaped.

Rauf’s parents, who live in the Ward End area of Birmingham, have not
received confirmation of his death, a friend of the family confirmed. The man, a shopkeeper who asked not to be named, said: “They don’t know anything about this … They have got no information and it’s obviously not nice for them.” A man who later emerged from the Rauf home, in a blue tracksuit and full beard, told reporters: “I am angry. For your own safety, all I can say to you is goodbye.”

The UK Foreign Office could not confirm Rauf’s killing. But Sherry Rehman, the Pakistani information minister, stated: “Sources have confirmed that Rashid Rauf and Masri were targets and have been killed.”

Other Pakistani officials said that the bodies of the two men, along
with five others killed, would be collected for DNA tests. However,
Rauf’s Pakistani lawyer, Hashmat Ali Habib, said that fighters appeared to have removed the bodies. “We are still not sure, it’s all suspicious.”
http://www.jamaat.org/news/2008/Nov/21/1001.html

Leave a Comment

6 Pakistanis in Guantanamo, NA told

02020On Nov 10, 2008, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi informed the National Assembly that six Pakistanis were held in the Guantanamo bay detention camp.

The Foreign Office had said on October 31 that there were five Pakistanis in the US prison.

The foreign minister identified the six Pakistanis as:

  • Hafiz Qari Mohammed Saad Iqbal Madni (sent to Guantanamo in July 2002)
  • Saifullah Paracha (Sept 2004)
  • Abdul Rabbani Abd Al Rahim Abu Rahman (Sept 2004)
  • Mohammad Ahmad Ghulam Rabbani (Sept 2004)
  • Majid Khan (The State Department could not give the date when he was brought to Guantanamo bay)
  • Ammar Al Baluchi (Sept 2006)

The minister said the government had been trying at political and diplomatic levels for early repatriation of the Pakistanis.

Leave a Comment

Protest for Release of Afia Siddiqui: Oct 29/ 2008

Wearing pink badges marked with No. 650, signifying the prisoner number of an unidentified woman in Bagram Jail, the relatives of missing persons on October 29/ 2008 gathered in front of Geo TV building in Islamabad for yet another peaceful effort to press for the release of their dear ones.

This time joined by a large number of civil society representatives, members of Jamaat-e-Islami and Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf, the speakers at the protest urged the government to halt all cooperation with the US till the release of all missing persons held in Pakistan and in other countries.

The protesters held placards demanding release of Dr Aafia Siddiqui and other missing persons and condemned former president Musharraf for selling Pakistani citizens to other countries. Representatives of Pakistan Professional Forum and common citizens were also part of the protest.

Describing her struggle to reach Prisoner No. 650, the British journalist, Ms Ridley said that prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and those who fled the notorious Bagram Jail confirmed the presence of a woman in Bagram who was brutally tortured and repeatedly raped. “The cries of a helpless woman used to echo in the jail that prompted prisoners to go on a hunger strike,” she said.

Marium, Ms Ridley’s Muslim name, said that “There are many Muslim women in the captivity of American forces and are in the same or even worse condition than that of Dr. Aafia,” she said adding that if public remained silent, they would lose their sisters forever. “I beg you to join in my struggle of finding prisoner 650.” She expressed disappointment over the insensitive attitude of the public towards the miserable condition of missing persons. She said that Taliban who were labelled barbaric and uncivilised gave her complete privacy in the prison. “No one used to enter my room without my permission,” she said.

Leading figure in the movement of missing persons, Amina Masood said that it was not difficult to imagine her misery, as she knew that her husband was alive but she was not allowed to even listen to his voice for the past three years. “If our relatives were sold to the American government then the present government should buy them back,” she said begging the leadership to end their ordeal.

She said that the government had promised to constitute a committee to look into the matter yet nothing practical had been done so far. “We do not want any committee, all we want is our dear ones,” she said adding that despite commitments made by the leaders in the government and opposition, the number of missing persons was continuously increasing.

Only a day before, Amina said that a mother of three daughters, Najma Bibi, was taken away by the agencies to an unknown place. She said that Pakistani government should make it clear to the American government that they could not be friends until all missing persons were released.

“The system of missing persons is causing great pain to the citizens of the country and is creating environment of distrust hence it should be completely eliminated,” she said with tears rolling down her eyes.

Leave a Comment

US CIA ILLEGALLY DETAINED DR SIDDIQUI IN SECRET CIA PRISONS: HRW

Ms Joanne Mariner – Director, Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Program, Human Rights Watch (HRW) based in New York, USA – told President Bush, through her letter of February 26/ 2007, that Pakistani citizen Dr. Aafia Siddiqui was illegally detained as an innocent hostage and unlawfully tortured in illegal, infamous secret prisons of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) after she was illegally kidnapped in March 2003 from Karachi.Recent press-media reports have pointed out that US Ambassador to Pakistan Ms. Anne W. Patterson is a diplomatic liar because she has falsely claimed, without any legal evidence or lawful proof, in her letter – printed by Daily Times, Dawn, The Nation, The News and some other Pakistani publications on August 16/ 2008 – that:

 

“Allegations that Ms Siddiqui has been in custody at the Bagram Theatre Internment Facility in Afghanistan are completely erroneous. Ms. Siddiqui was not in the custody of the United States – either at Afghanistan’s Bagram Air Base or anywhere else – at any time prior to her detention by Afghan police on July 17, 2008. The US did not have knowledge of her whereabouts until she was detained by Afghan police on July 17, 2008. Ms. Siddiqui is accused of seizing a weapon and firing – unprovoked – on U.S. personnel during questioning. She sustained non-life threatening injuries, received prompt medical attention, and is expected to fully recover. At no time was Ms. Siddiqui mistreated or abused in any manner whatsoever. There was absolutely no reward or ‘bounty’ paid by the US for the capture of Ms. Siddiqui. The United States has no definitive knowledge as to the whereabouts of Ms. Siddiqui’s children.”

 

Read this letter of Human Rights Watch (HRW) to President Bush:

 

February 26/ 2007

President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

 

Dear President Bush:

 

I am writing to request information about people who were previously held in secret detention facilities operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Specifically, I ask that you disclose the identities, fate and current whereabouts of all prisoners held for any period of time at facilities operated or controlled by the CIA since 2001. In addition, for any such prisoners who were transferred to the custody of another government, I ask that you disclose the date and location of the transfer.

 

I would like first to express Human Rights Watch’s strong concern over the CIA’s use of secret prisons to hold people suspected of involvement in terrorism. By holding such people in unacknowledged, incommunicado detention, the United States violated fundamental human rights norms, in particular, the prohibition on enforced disappearance.

 

HRW recognizes that some terrorism suspects may have committed serious crimes that merit the sanction of incarceration. The decision to imprison such persons must be taken in accordance with legal processes, however. If such persons are indeed implicated in terrorist crimes, they should be charged and prosecuted, not subject to enforced disappearance.

 

I would note that, to date, your administration has concealed nearly all information regarding persons imprisoned by the CIA since 2001. In a televised speech in early September 2006, you did acknowledge that the CIA had been secretly detaining suspected terrorists in facilities outside of the United States. But while you announced that 14 people who had previously been in CIA detention had been transferred to the US detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay – saying that with those transfers there were no more people in CIA custody – you said nothing about the fate or whereabouts of other persons who were believed to have been detained by the CIA.

 

It is beyond dispute that more than 14 people were imprisoned by the CIA at some point prior to September 2006. Indeed, in April 2006, just a few months before your speech, Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte publicly acknowledged that the CIA was holding some three dozen persons in detention.

 

Given the close secrecy surrounding the CIA’s detention practices, HRW does not believe that it has information about every person who, since 2001, has been held in CIA detention. But based on accounts from former detainees, press articles and other sources, HRW has put together a list of 16 people whom we believe were once held in CIA prisons and whose current whereabouts are unknown. We have also compiled a separate list of 22 people who were possibly once held in CIA prisons and whose current whereabouts are also unknown.

 

The following [16] people – whose name, nationality, and place and date of arrest are provided, where known – are believed to have once been held in secret CIA prisons:

 

1. Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi (Libyan – Pakistan, 11/2001 – By some accounts, al-Libi was transferred from CIA custody to Libya in early 2006, but this has not been confirmed.).

 

2. Mohammed Omar Abdel-Rahman (aka Asadallah – Egyptian – Quetta, Pakistan, 2/2003).

 

3. Yassir al-Jazeeri (Algerian – Lahore, Pakistan, 3/2003).

 

4. Suleiman Abdalla Salim (Kenyan – Mogadishu, Somalia, 3/2003).

 

5. Marwan al-Adeni (Yemeni – approximately 5/2003).

 

6. Ali Abd al Rahman al Faqasi al Ghamdi (aka Abu Bakr al Azdi – Saudi – Medina, Saudi Arabia, 6/2003).

 

7. Hassan Ghul (Pakistani – northern Iraq, 1/2004).

 

8. Ayoub al-Libi (Libyan – Peshawar, 1/2004).

 

9. Mohammed al Afghani (Afghan, born in Saudi Arabia – Peshawar, 5/2004).

 

10. Abdul Basit (probably Saudi or Yemeni – arrested before 6/2004).

 

11. Adnan (arrested before 6/2004).

 

12. Hudeifa (arrested before 6/2004).

 

13.Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan (aka Abu Talaha – Pakistani – Lahore, 7/2004).

 

14. Muhammad Setmarian Naser (Syrian/Spanish – Quetta, 11/2005).

 

15. Unnamed Somali (possibly Shoeab as-Somali).

 

16. Unnamed Somali (possibly Rethwan as-Somali).

 

In addition, the following [22] people may have once been held in secret CIA prisons:

 

1. Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi (presumably Iraqi – 1/2002).

 

2. Anas al-Liby (Libyan – Khartoum, Sudan, 2/2002).

 

3. Retha al-Tunisi (Tunisian – Karachi, early-to-mid-2002).

 

4. Sheikh Ahmed Salim (aka Swedan) (Tanzanian – Kharadar, Pakistan,

7/2002).

 

5. Saif al Islam el Masry (Egyptian – Pankisi Gorge, Georgia, 9/2002).

 

6. Amin al-Yafia (Yemeni – Iran, 2002).

 

7. al-Rubaia (Iraqi – Iran, 2002).

 

8. Aafia Siddiqui (Pakistani – Karachi, Pakistan, 3/2003).

 

9. Jawad al-Bashar (Egyptian – Vindher, Balochistan, Pakistan, 5/2003).

 

10. Safwan al- Hasham (aka Haffan al-Hasham – Saudi – Hyderabad, 5/2003).

 

11. Abu Naseem (Tunisian – Peshawar, 6/2003).

 

12. Walid bin Azmi (unknown nationality – Karachi, 1/2004).

 

13. Ibad Al Yaquti al Sheikh al Sufiyan (Saudi – Karachi, 1/2004).

 

14. Amir Hussein Abdullah al-Misri (aka Fazal Mohammad Abdullah al-Misri
Egyptian – Karachi, 1/2004).

 

15. Khalid al-Zawahiri (Egyptian – South Waziristan, Pakistan, 2/2004).

 

16. Musaab Aruchi (aka al-Baluchi – Pakistani – Karachi, 6/2004).

 

17. Qari Saifullah Akhtar (Pakistani – arrested in the UAE, 8/2004).

 

18. Mustafa Mohamed Fadhil (Kenyan/Egyptian – eastern Punjab, Pakistan,
8/2004).

 

19. Sharif al-Masri (Egyptian – Pakistan border, 8/2004).

 

20. Osama Nazir (Pakistani – Faisalabad, 11/2004).

 

21. Osama bin Yousaf (Pakistani – Faisalabad, 8/2005).

 

22. Speen Ghul (from Africa – Pakistan).

 

HRW is extremely concerned about the fate of these people. One possibility is that the CIA may have transferred some of them to foreign prisons where for practical purposes they remain under CIA control. Another worrying alternative is that prisoners were transferred from CIA custody to places where they face a serious risk of torture, in violation of the fundamental prohibition on returns to torture. We note that some of the missing prisoners are from Algeria, Egypt, Libya and Syria, countries where the torture of terrorism suspects is common.

 

Enforced disappearance violates both international human rights law and international humanitarian law. It has long been recognized that enforced disappearance is a “continuous crime until the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person becomes known.” We note, therefore, that persons “disappeared” in US custody who have since been transferred elsewhere remain the legal obligation of the US so long as their fate or whereabouts remain unknown.

 

I would also like to point out that refusing to reveal the whereabouts of these people is extraordinarily cruel to their families. To take one small but telling detail, the wife of a man who has not been seen since he was believed to have been taken into CIA custody told HRW that she has continually lied to her four children about her husband’s absence. She explained that she could not bear telling them that she did not know where he was: “What I am hoping is if they find out their father has been detained, that I will at least be able to tell them what country he is being held in, and in what conditions.”

As you may know, the CIA’s detention program has inflicted great harm on the reputation, moral standing and integrity of the US. By revealing information about the fate and whereabouts of people formerly held in CIA custody, you could begin to repair the damage this abusive program has caused.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Joanne Mariner
Director
Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Program
Human Rights Watch
http://www.hrw.org

 

Cc: Condoleezza Rice, United States Secretary of State.

John M. McConnell, United States Director of National Intelligence.

Gen. Michael V. Hayden, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

John B. Bellinger, III, Legal Adviser to the Secretary of State of the
United States.

 

 

Leave a Comment

DR AAFIA SIDDIQUI’S SISTER SPEAKS

 

 

For years our family was enduring this plight on our own. Few months back, I felt I was alone with an ailing mother, but today I feel I have millions of family members with me in this plight to stand
up and defend the ultimate symbol of purity and innocence: My sister, Aafia Siddiqui.

Sometimes events occur in the lives of individuals and in the lives of nations that transcend all petty issues. It is these times when a person’s and a nation’s resolve, honour and courage are tested. Today we are confronted with such a test.

 

The matter is really simple. An ordinary Pakistani wrongfully taken to a foreign country [USA] without established processes. She disappeared from Karachi [Pakistan] without any legal or judicial process.

 

The Issue: What is a Pakistani worth to its Government?

 

How we define the life of a single Pakistani, will define how each one of us is identified and valued by others.

 

If the nation and its government can unify to make the life of one Pakistani a top priority and have the faith and confidence to stake its policy on the safety of that one life, then we will have redefined
the value of all Pakistanis and the dignity of the whole nation. Each politician will be a hero and each citizen more respectable in the world.

 

After all, remember that it is the cries of one woman (in the court of Raja Dahir) that defines our very existence in this subcontinent and now another woman’s cries challenge our right to continue that existence.

 

We have already seen that a new day is dawning in this country. The leaders of all groups should take the opportunity to continue to demonstrate that the changes are not just about the politicians at the top but now the citizens will matter. This is a case that is human at its core and universal in appeal. If we can show results for her, the country can believe that we can show results for the other issues as well.

 

We do not believe Aafia can get justice in the U.S. We are in fear that the US authorities holding Aafia have almost completed their “script” to explain her “discovery”. They conveniently disown ever having her in US custody. They are sure to make her out to be a major terror figure to mask the
five years of torture, rape and child molestation as reported by human rights groups.
Who knows, the list of charges may even include responsibility for the Tsunami or the October 7th earthquake.

 

But remember, in five years she was not charged with anything. And it is proof of her innocence and we should not forget that regardless of the spins that continue to emerge. Even her FBI poster says all she was sought for was possible information – FIVE YEARS AGO. No reward, no terrorism charge, not even considered armed and dangerous!

 

http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/siddiqui.htm

 

But five years later, after international outcry finally got momentum, a major cover has to be developed. The location of the court a mile from ground zero in New York, the selection of the jury who have lost someone in 9/11, poisoning them with media reports, using a Pakistani woman [Ms. Mehtab Syed] sworn FBI agent to file the complaint, threatening our local media. The delay in medical care, basic human rights violations, dehumanizing strip searches, I could go on and on.

Given recent history, the odds of any fair hearing, let alone trial, are negligible. We are told we are poor and powerless, but are we really? Certainly, we are not without power. We have strategic value to the world that we seldom exert. Well, now is the time to exert it and shed the image of
the beggar and regain some pride.

 

While resolutions are welcome, they must not be impotent. Please link her release to Pakistan’s continued cooperation on many fronts. Let’s define what cooperation means with our friends. It must work both ways.

 

This is a story of much greater significance than just my sister or one woman. Her torture is a crime beyond anything she was ever accused of (which was basically nothing) and this is a slap on the honor of our nation and the whole of humanity. The perpetrators of those crimes are the ones who need to be brought to account. That is the real crime of terror here. There are innocent children involved. Her 11-year-old son has been identified in Afghanistan, but in U.S. custody, and there are credible
reports that he may be in Guantanamo Bay! Are they charging him as a potential terrorist or using him against his mom?

 

Two other kids are also involved, whom we will continue to search for.

 

This is not a gamble. It is a show of resolve and commitment. I strongly believe we are not a helpless and useless nation even though at times we behave as if we are. We must stop being self-defeatist.

I appeal to your humanity and your courage:

 

·     Expedite the extradition of Aafia back to Pakistan. The whole process is unlawful and there are a lot of lawyers here who know, her extradition from Pakistan to Afghanistan, from Afghanistan to US both were illegal. Aafia was a Pakistani and is a Pakistani, she never
had any other nationality.

 

·     Get custody of her 11-year-old son ASAP, whose innocence no one can deny. He has been identified in U.S. custody, location is vague, please exert all diplomatic pressure both on the U.S. and Afghanistan to locate and return him.

 

Ultimately, all is in Allah’s hands and we ask for His help and mercy.

 

Thank you.

 

Dr Fowzia Siddiqui

Dr. Aafia Siddiqui’s only and elder sister Consultant Neurologist and Epileptologist Co-Director Epilepsy Program
Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
Director Epilepsy Telemedicine program and Epilepsy Clinics
Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (3)

Missing Persons in Pakistan: Where is my Baba?

Where Is My Baba? 

Words fail to describe the feelings of hopelessness one feels when your protectors turn predators, pluck you from your surroundings, maim, torture and kill your or sell you to the highest bidder. All in the name of protecting freedom and liberty, without any due process of law.
This is precisely what has been achieved by the Government of Pakistan, most allied of the allies in the ‘War against Terror’. What was once a remote occurrence for us, in distant lands of South America is here, among us and around us. The desaparecidos of Chile, Argentina and Guatemala have become our gum shuda people. According to a document issued in 2006, there were 63 Pakistani in illegal American custody in Guantanamo. Scores others have been probably killed by our own authorities. This was one of the crimes of Honourable Justice Chaudhry that he took notice, and is having to pay the price.
But remember, misuse of power will not be forgotten or forgiven by the people of Pakistan. The current rulers of Pakistan also have reason to fear, not only the national, but the world wide ‘judicial activism’. Pinochet, the former dictator of Chile, was visiting the UK, in 1998, when he was arrested under European Law, on a warrant issued by the Spanish Government, on charges of murder. He was released only in 2000, on the excuse of ill health by the British government.
The Aliens Tort Claims Act can be and has been used to bring civil proceedings against any individual in America for crimes committed anywhere in the world, including human rights violations. (For example, Nawaz Sharif could sue Shaukat Aziz for illegally deporting him, and our banker- prime minister would be at risk of losing his New York real estate)
See here the documentary (24 minutes) by the brave Ziad Zafar. It is not easy viewing. It shows you the sinister face of our security angencies.

See BBC Urdu, Missing Pakistanis page here   
 

 

__._,_.___ !

Comments (2)

Older Posts »