Qaddafi’s Contributions for Libya

There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.

There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at 0% interest by law.

Home is considered a human right in Libya –Gaddafi vowed that his parents would not get a house until everyone in Libya had a home. Gaddafi’s father died without a home.

All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 Dinar (US$ 50,000 ) by the government to buy their first apartment to help them start up the family.

Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25% of Libyans were literate. Today the figure is 83%.

Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments, seeds and livestock to kick- start their farms – all for free.

If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need in Libya, the government funds them to go abroad for it – not only free but they get US $2, 300/mth accommodation and car allowance.

If a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50% of the price.

The price of petrol in Libya is $0. 14 per liter.

Libya has no external debt and its reserves amounting to $150 billion – now frozen globally.

If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state would pay the average salary of the profession as if he or she is employed until employment is found.

A portion of Libyan oil sale is, credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.

A mother who gives birth to a child receive US $5 ,000.

40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $ 0.15.

25% of Libyans have a university degree.

Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project, known as the Great Man-Made River project, to make water readily available throughout the desert country.

Qaddafi’s Daughter Aisha About to Give Birth

Gaddafi’s wife, two sons and a daughter have entered Algeria as of August 29, 2011, the foreign ministry in Algiers announced, prompting a swift rebel request for the Libyan leader’s relatives to be sent back.

“The wife of Muammar Gaddafi, Safiya, his daughter Aisha, and sons Hannibal and Mohammed, accompanied by their children, entered Algeria at 8.45 am through the Algeria-Libyan border,” the ministry said.

Gaddafi’s daughter Aisha is nine months pregnant, while Gaddafi himself and two other sons were hiding south ofTripoli.

It is understood Algeria’s actions would allow the Gaddafi family a “pass” to enter a third country.

Algeria said they gave a pass to go to a third country. It confirmed that it welcomed them toAlgeriafor humanitarian reasons.

So far, Algiers has adopted a stance of strict neutrality on the conflict in its neighbour, leading some among the rebels to accuse it of supporting the Gaddafi regime.

It did not explain its decision to allow Gaddafi’s family into Algeria.

The rebel leadership said that it did not understand how anyone could “save Gaddafi’s family” and wanted them back inLibya. It said that “saving Gaddafi’s family is not an act we welcome and understand,” he said. “We’d like those persons to come back.”

It said that “this information has been brought to the attention of the United Nations Secretary General, the security council president and Mahmud Jibril, president of the executive council of the National Transitional Council (NTC),” the interim administrative body set up by the rebels fighting Gaddafi for power inLibya, the ministry statement said.

Muammar Gaddafi has 7 sons, 1 daughter and 1 adopted son.

Almost all of them were involved in his regime.

They are all in a life-and-death struggle which cannot end well for them. When their father’s regime topples, they lose everything. Most of them demonstrate the ruthless gene that drives their father.

Aisha al-Gaddafi (born 1977): The only daughter is a real piece of work. Growing up with her gang of tough brothers put iron in her spine. In some ways, she is the most diabolical of a diabolic clan.

Aisha is an attorney who defended Saddam Hussein as well as Muntadhar al-Zaidi who threw a shoe at Bush during a press conference in Iraq.  She was a United Nations Goodwill Ambassador until yesterday when stripped of her position by the UN. Her smile said she couldn’t care less.

She also heads a charity.

Muhammad Gaddafi - involved in Libyan Olympic Committee and telecommunications. He is silent these days.

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi - until his recent TV appearances, Saif was considered by the West to be intelligent and urbane. He has a doctorate from the London School of Economics. His thesis was oddly enough on democracy rising out of authoritarian states. Students today at LSE are demonstrating for the school to take away his degrees.

His first appearance on State TV showed first a cold, calculating mafia-type monster who rambled on with lies about his father’s regime that certainly totally destroyed his credibility with the outside world. This second showed a panicked, angry man spewing even more dribble that no one believes.

Saadi Gaddafi – His interests are soccer and the film industry, but it is said he has charge of one of his father’s many personally-loyal brigades.

Mutassim (Moatassem) Gaddafi – Lt. Col. in the Libyan Army and National Security Advisor. He also heads his own brigade. Mutassim (Moatassem) fled to Europe after being implicated in a failed coup to unseat his father. He was eventually forgiven and returned to power. He has served as National Security Advisor since 2010.

Hannibal Gaddafi (born 1978) - It seems he lives up to his unfortunate name. He’s one of the most volatile of a volatile and violent family. He has left a trail of scandals of attacks and assaults throughout Europe. He controls one of the special brigades which is not part of the army, but answers to Gaddafi’s Revolutionary Committees.

Saif al-Arab Gaddafi – Until recently, he spent his life out of the limelight in Germany. Al Jazeera has reported him back in the country defending his family’s regime.

Khamis Gaddafi - He is one to rival his brother Hannibal for spine-chilling character. Khamis is a Russian-trained police officer and heads his own special forces Khamis Brigade. This is the brigade sent in to quell the revolt inEastern Libya when it became apparent to the regime that they couldn’t depend on the army to fire on their own people. He is the likely person in charge of  directing the foreign mercenaries said to be from Sub-Sahara Africa and the old Soviet bloc.

One adopted son:

Milad Abuztaia al-Gaddafi – His nephew, Milad is said to have saved Gaddafi’s life when the US bombed the family compound in 1986.  Not hearing anything about him, but assume he is fighting for his survival and the survival of the family like the rest of them.

One adopted daughter deceased:
Hanna Gaddafi. Hanna was a small child when killed by theUS bomb attack in 1986.

Why Did Qatar Return the Raped Libyan Woman?

Despite concerns for her safety,Qataron June 2, 2011 sent back toLibyaa woman who accused the soldiers of Qadhafi of having raped her.

A Qatari military plane flew Iman al-Obeidi to the Libyan port city ofBenghazi, which is held by rebels, and she was now staying there in a hotel.

She expressed her fears of returning toLibya, that there was no question of her returning toLibya.

There are people inLibyawho have an interest in shutting her up… Her fear is well founded in our opinion.

Obeidi had escaped fromLibyatoQatarwith the help of rebels.

Obeidi attracted international media attention when she stormed into the Rixos hotel on March 26, threw open her coat to reveal scars and bruises on her body to expose her ordeal.

But as she screamed: “Film me, film me, show the whole world all they did to me,” she was dragged off by security guards amid scenes of mayhem as journalists were shoved aside in their effort to intervene.

Obeidi said she had been stopped at aTripolicheckpoint because she was from the rebel stronghold ofBenghaziin easternLibya. “They tied me up and abused me for two days,” she said.

After a petition demanding her release, Obeidi said in telephone interviews that she was freed but not allowed to leaveLibya. A doctor had examined her and supported her claims of rape and torture.

Libyan Woman Struggles to Tell Media of Her Rape

By David D. Kirkpatrick

Published in NYT: March 26, 2011

A Libyan woman burst into the hotel housing the foreign press in Tripoli on March 26 morning in an attempt to tell journalists that she had been raped and beaten by members of Col.Qaddafi’s militia. After struggling for nearly an hour to resist removal by Colonel Qaddafi’s security forces, she was dragged away from the hotel screaming.

“They say that we are all Libyans and we are one people,” said the woman, who gave her name as Eman al-Obeidy, barging in during breakfast at the hotel dining room. “But look at what the Qaddafi men did to me.” She displayed a broad bruise on her face, a large scar on her upper thigh, several narrow and deep scratch marks lower on her leg, and marks from binding around her hands and feet.

She said she had been raped by 15 men. “I was tied up, and they defecated and urinated on me,” she said. “They violated my honor.”

She pleaded for friends she said were still in custody. “They are still there, they are still there,” she said. “As soon as I leave here, they are going to take me to jail.”

For the members of the foreign news media here at the invitation of the government of Colonel Qaddafi — and largely confined to the Rixos Hotel except for official outings — the episode was a reminder of the brutality of the Libyan government and the presence of its security forces even among the hotel staff. People in hotel uniforms, who just hours before had been serving coffee and clearing plates, grabbed table knives and rushed to restrain the woman and to hold back the journalists.

Ms Obeidy said she was a native of the rebel stronghold of Benghazi who had been stopped by Qaddafi militia on the outskirts of Tripoli. After being held for about two days, she said, she had managed to escape. Wearing a black robe, a veil and slippers, she ran into the Rixos Hotel here, asking specifically to speak to the news service Reuters and The New York Times. “There is no media coverage outside,” she yelled at one point.

“They swore at me and they filmed me. I was alone. There was whiskey. I was tied up. I am not scared of anything. I will be locked up immediately after this.” She added: “Look at my face. Look at my back.” Her other comments were captured by television cameras.

A wild scuffle began as journalists tried to interview, photograph and protect her. Several journalists were punched, kicked and knocked down by the security forces, working in tandem with people who until then had appeared to be hotel staff members. Security officials destroyed a CNN video camera and seized a device that a Financial Times reporter had used to record her testimony. A plainclothes security officer pulled out a revolver.

Two members of the hotel staff grabbed table knives to threaten Ms Obeidy and the journalists.

“Turn them around, turn them around,” a waiter shouted, trying to block the foreign news media from having access to Ms. Obeidy. A woman on the staff shouted: “Why are you doing this? You are a traitor!” and briefly put a coat over Ms Obeidy’s head.

There was a prolonged standoff behind the hotel as the security officials apparently restrained themselves because of the presence of so many journalists, but Ms Obeidy was ultimately forced into a white car and taken away.

“Leave me alone,” she shouted as one man tried to cover her mouth with his hand.

“They are taking me to jail,” she yelled, trying to resist the security guards. “They are taking me to jail.”

Questioned about her treatment, Khalid Kaim, the deputy foreign minister, promised that she would be treated in accordance with the law.

After the episode, Musa Ibrahim, a government spokesman, said she appeared to be drunk and mentally ill. He said that the authorities were investigating the case, including the possibility that her reports of abuse were “fantasies.”

In a news conference later, Mr. Ibrahim said that Ms. Obeidy was in the custody of Libyan police detectives who were treating her as a sane person with a credible criminal case of abduction and rape. “It is a criminal case, not a political case,” he said, promising that it would be investigated to the full extent of the law and that she would have a chance to meet again with journalists.

Charles Clover of The Financial Times, who had put himself in the way of the security forces trying to apprehend her, was put into a van and driven to the border shortly afterward. He said that the night before, he had been told to leave because of what Libyan government officials said were inaccuracies in his reports.

Libyan Massacre Referred to International Criminal Court

History was made last weekend with the unanimous decision of the United Nations Security Council to refer the situation in Libya to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

For the first time, the entire Security Council—including all the permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)—voted in favor of mandating the ICC to secure justice in the face of a threat to international peace and security.

It was an unprecedented expression of the world community’s growing trust in the ICC, the first permanent and independent international judicial institution with jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of international concern—genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression.

The ICC is based on a treaty, the Rome Statute, which was adopted in 1998 and is now joined by 114 nations from all regions of the world. The Court’s member states represent diverse legal and religious traditions as well as many different constitutional systems such as republics, federations and monarchies. But a mere fraction of the States Parties are from Asia and only two of them—Cambodia and Timor-Leste—from Southeast Asia.

As the ICC increasingly takes center stage in the global fight against impunity and the protection of the most fundamental human rights, now would be an excellent time for Asia to adopt a stronger role in the ICC.

One of my main goals as the first Asian president of the ICC is to facilitate an informed decision-making process in the Asian countries considering ratification of the Rome Statute. This week I will be in the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei to raise awareness about the ICC for that purpose.

The International Criminal Court is the result of long-lasting efforts by the global community to put an end to unimaginable atrocities that have plagued humankind for far too long. I personally experienced the horrors of war in my home country, Korea, when I was a child, and I feel honored to be part of this new institution which bears the promise of a more peaceful future for our children and grandchildren.

The ICC opened its doors in 2002, and after just eight and a half years it is a fully functioning international criminal court, with situations in five countries under investigation. Three cases are on trial, involving gruesome allegations such as the use of child soldiers, murder, rape and attacks against civilians.

As a neutral, judicial body, the ICC observes the highest standards of fairness and due process in all of its activities.

Under the Rome Statute system, national justice systems retain the primary responsibility to prosecute atrocity crimes. The ICC is a court of last resort that can step in only where a State is unwilling or unable to carry out genuine investigations or prosecutions.

Joining the ICC would provide additional protection to your nation against the gravest violations of the universally recognized human rights. If anyone intended to commit such crimes on your territory, you would have the support of the 114 States Parties of the Rome Statute in responding to such violence with the force of law.

States Parties to the Rome Statute also have the right to nominate candidates and to vote in the election of the highest officials to the ICC. The next prosecutor and six judges will be elected at the end of this year, so now would be a good time to join the ICC to shape its future development and make it even more global than it is now.

Asian countries have become known as the world’s economic tigers—let us make the region a justice tiger as well!

by Judge Sang-Hyun Song is president of the International Criminal Court

CIA’s Campaign to Remove Libya from the UN Human Rights Council

The election of the Libyan Arab Jamahariya to the United Nations Human Rights Council is an outrage to the global human rights community.

Given its notorious record as one of the world’s worst violators of human rights, the Qaddafi regime’s membership on the Council flies in the face of the United Nations’ promise, enshrined in Resolution 60/251 (2006), to elect member states that are committed to the promotion and protection of human rights.

We call on the international community to invoke Article 8 of the aforementioned resolution, which provides for the suspension of membership of states that commit systematic violations of human rights, unless and until the Qaddafi regime:

• Ends its systematic violation of the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the right to equality, the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to free political organization;

• Ends its practices of arbitrary arrest, torture, and discrimination against minorities, in particular, the persecution of two million black African migrants;

• Acknowledges its crimes commiitted against the six medical workers, who were framed in 1998 under false charges of poisoning children with HIV, and then imprisoned, tortured, and sentenced to death row; apologizes; and provides full compensation to the six victims;

• Acknowledges its crimes in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and ceases to celebrate the convicted Libyan agent who was released from prison last year;

• Agrees to an international, independent investigation into the imprisonment and torture of Libyan human rights activist and dissident Fathi Eljahmi, resulting finally in his death in 2009; and

• Agrees to an international, independent investigation into the massacre of an estimated 1200 prisoners of the Abu Salim prison.

Dr Mohamed M. Bugaighis American Libyan Freedom Alliance

Khaled Ghawi Association of Libya Imal/ Libya Future

Mamadi Kaba African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights (Raddho-Guinee)

Bart Woord International Federation of Liberal Youth

Harris O. Schoenberg UN Reform Advocates

Amina Bouayach Moroccan Organization for Human Rights (OMDH)

Mike Gesa Munabi Students for Global Democracy Uganda

Gibreil I. M. Hamid Darfur Peace and Development Center

Dr Theodor Rathgeber Forum Human Rights Germany

Hillel C. Neuer United Nations Watch Switzerland

Tilder Kumichii Ndichia Gender Empowerment & Development

Kok Ksor The Montagnard Foundation

Sister Catherine C. Waters Catholic International Education Office (OIEC)

Mrs C. Gautam Nepal International Consumers Union

Logan Maurer International Christian Concern

Obinna Egbuka Youth Enhancement Organization Nigeria

Virginia S. Mueller International Association of Women Lawyers

Dickson Mugendi David Ntwiga Solidarity House International

Robert Triozzi Chief, FRDP

Klaus Netter Main Representative CBJO

Dr. Marlette Black International Presentation Association

Armand Azoulai Main Representative BBI

An Anti Gaddafi Tirade

We are alarmed by Libya’s candidacy for next week’s elections to the UN Human Rights Council, and urge you to sign the Joint Civil Society Appeal below.  A statement of protest was issued this week at the United Nations by Mohammed Eljahmi, the brother of Libya’s leading dissident Fathi Eljahmi, who was tortured and killed by the Qaddafi regime.  Additional protests were announced by the five Bulgarian nurses and the Palestinian doctor who were framed and tortured under false accusations of poisoning children in a Beghazi hospital. The human rights community as whole must join the victims in expressing its outrage. 

To join this urgent appeal, reply to this email by Monday with your (1) name; (2) title; (3) name of organization and (4) country. 

Hillel C. Neuer

Executive Director

United Nations Watch 

Campaign contact: stoplibya@unwatch.org 

JOINT CIVIL SOCIETY APPEAL TO OPPOSE ELECTION OF LIBYA TO THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 

TO:       Ambassador Susan Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN

            Ambassador Juan Antonio Yáñez-Barnuevo, Spanish Permanent Representative to the UN, Presidency of the EU Council 

May 10, 2010 

Dear Ambassador Rice and Ambassador Yáñez-Barnuevo, 

We, the undersigned urge you to lead a campaign to ensure that the Libyan regime of Col. Moammar Qaddafi — one of the world’s most brutal and longest-running tyrannies — will be kept off the UN Human Rights Council in the upcoming May 13, 2010 elections to be held at the General Assembly in New York. 

We recall the lasting damage caused by Libya’s election as Chair of the Commission on Human Rights in 2003, and are alarmed that history may now be repeating itself. 

When the new Council was created in 2006, it was supposed to improve on its widely discredited predecessor, the similarly-named Commission on Human Rights. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged that the old Commission suffered from a fatal “credibility deficit”— one that was casting “a shadow on the reputation of the United Nations system as a whole.” He decried a situation where countries sought membership of the Commission “not to strengthen human rights but to protect themselves against criticism or to criticize others.” “Politicization” and “selectivity,” according to Secretary-General Annan, were nothing less than “hallmarks of the Commission’s existing system.” 

The new Council, however, promised to be different, with criteria of membership that contemplate electing those who “uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights.” 

Libya, by any measure, completely fails this test. The Libyan regime of Col. Qaddafi received Freedom House’s worst possible score on political rights and civil liberties, qualifying it as one of the world’s most repressive societies. Political parties, free speech and open media are banned. Violators face jail or the death sentence. Col. Qaddafi’s regime controls the country’s only internet service provider. 

The Qaddafi regime also practices racial discrimination, persecuting two million black African migrants. In 1998, the UN itself — its Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination — expressed concern over Libya’s “acts of discrimination against migrant workers on the basis of their national or ethnic origin.” In 2000, the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions issued a condemnation of “racist attacks on migrant workers” in Libya. 

Tragically, this Libyan racism continues unabated. In its report dated March 22, 2009, the New York Times quoted former Libyan Minister of Trade Ali Abd Alaziz Isawi saying that black migrants “spread disease” and “crime.” For the African migrants themselves, reported the Times, life in Libya is often a dead end. “They call us animals and slaves,” said Paul Oknonghou, 28, a Nigerian migrant, who lives in a house crammed with a dozen others, lacking running water or a bathroom. “[A]pproximately two million Africans flocked to Libya believing that they would find warm receptions, good jobs and, perhaps, an easy path to Europe,” reported the Times. “Instead, they found a hostile environment and a struggle just to eat.” 

Col. Qaddafi belongs in jail, not on the world’s highest human rights body. As documented in the recent joint report by Freedom House and UN Watch, Libya can be blocked if 96 countries decide to vote No. Although there are currently only 4 African states running for 4 seats—a closed slate—nevertheless Libya cannot be elected without 97 affirmative votes. According to Rule 94 of the UNGAR Rules of Procedure, Libya’s failure to win 97 votes in three rounds of voting would open up the field to other candidates.  We urge you to act before the May 13 election, to encourage qualified African states to declare their candidacy, and to assist their campaigns. 

In this regard, we recognize that your request for others to run will be made more difficult by the actions of your own regional group, the Western European and Others Group (WEOG), which, for the second year in a row, has submitted a closed slate—only two nominees, Switzerland and Spain, for two seats. This contravenes the 2006 promise that the reformed Council would bring competitive elections, and sets a poor example. We urge WEOG to rise to the occasion and encourage other of its member states, both EU and non-EU, to submit their candidacies. 

In conclusion, we appreciate the political and economic reality whereby Libya has the ability to achieve broad influence with its vast oil reserves. Nevertheless, we trust that the influential countries whom you represent can and will lead a successful campaign to persuade a minimum of 96 UN member states to oppose this murderous, repressive and racist regime from winning a seat on the Human Rights Council. 

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Gaddafi’s Son Desires to Make Libya Like Holland

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, 37, the son of Libya’s four-decade-long leader Muammar Gaddafi, finds himself at the heart of a political battle for his country’s future. To hear Saif tell it, the need for reform is urgent. “The whole world is going through more freedom, more democracy. We want to see those changes now, instead of 10 years’ time, or 15 years.” 

Just over six years ago, Saif coaxed his father into abandoning Libya’s chemical- and nuclear-weapons program. Muammar Gaddafi’s stunning about face, which followed longstanding demands from Washington, ended Libya’s isolation from the West. Trade embargoes and an air blockade that had sealed most Libyans from the outside world for decades were lifted. 

In late 2008 the U.S. confirmed its first ambassador to Tripoli since 1972. More than 100 oil companies, including U.S. majors like Chevron and ExxonMobil, and European giants such as BP and Royal Dutch Shell, arrived to tap Libya’s vast oil reserves, betting that the country would become an energy powerhouse. Construction crews now bang and clatter across Tripoli, building apartment and office towers, Western hotels (InterContinental, Starwood and Marriott are all working on new hotels) and a new airport. 

But for all the new glitz and buzz, Libya’s international acceptance has not brought deeper political or social change. 

In September 2009, Gaddafi celebrated his 40th anniversary in power with a blowout party featuring an air force flypast, hundreds of performers and a massive fireworks display. Aged just 68, Gaddafi Senior is now the world’s longest-serving head of government (a few monarchs beat him when it comes to longest-serving head of state). 

His face peers from billboards across the country, and his firebrand style has barely tempered with age. His blast against Western leaders in his speech to the U.N. General Assembly in September  2009 could have been written years ago. The first sign visitors see at Tripoli airport is not an advertisement for Libya’s spectacular beaches or Roman ruins, but a quote from Gaddafi’s revolutionary manifesto, the Green Book, proclaiming workers to be “Partners Not Wage Earners.” Crucially, it is Gaddafi and his appointed revolutionary committees who still make all of Libya’s key decisions. 

As Western companies arrive with billions of dollars to spend, though, Gaddafi’s exhortations are beginning to sound like the language of a vanishing culture. Who will take his place? What will take his system’s place? Those questions are at the core of the political debate, and as yet, there are no clear answers. 

No one looms larger than Saif in the push for change. Given that he was raised in the bosom of the revolution and holds no official government position, that is unusual. Saif was born a little under three years after his father’s bloodless 1969 coup. After graduating in engineering in Libya, he earned an M.B.A. in Vienna, and then a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics

To many Americans and Britons, Saif is best known for successfully negotiating the release from a Scottish jail of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. Convicted of the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jet over Scotland — an attack which killed 270 people — al-Megrahi returned to a hero’s welcome in Tripoli in August 2009 with Saif by his side. The move cemented Saif’s standing among millions of ordinary Libyans. 

After that, Saif could no longer be accused of being infected with Western values,” says Noman Benotman, a former leader in the militant Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG, who fought alongside al-Qaeda in Afghanistan until 2000. Benotman is a lot less famous than al-Megrahi, but his collaboration with Saif may actually be the clearest sign that Gaddafi Junior is serious about reform. Saif brought Benotman to Libya in 2007 and then helped him negotiate a truce with hundreds of jailed LIFG militants, effectively severing their links with al-Qaeda. On March 23, Saif secured the release of 214 LIFG members from jail, including its three top leaders. 

Tall and lean with gold-rimmed glasses and a shaved head, Saif speaks fluent English and German, and is as comfortable in London as he is in Tripoli. A set of photo books called Hip Hotels sits on a table in his entrance hall. Despite his privileged lifestyle, his name creeps frequently into conversations with businessmen, analysts, consultants and regular citizens. He is, many believe, the one person capable of pushing through serious change. He is also the West’s favorite to succeed his father. 

If Saif is Libya’s future, then he might just trigger a transformation every bit as far-reaching as his father’s socialist coup. Already a Saif-created National Economic Development Board, run by U.S.-trained economist Mahmoud Gebril, is at work overhauling Libya’s regulatory system. Saif has also proposed a new penal code, which would entail drafting a constitution for Libya, a move regarded for years by Muammar Gaddafi as unrevolutionary. “There must be an independent judiciary, and protection of the rights of people,” Gebril says, pointing to postapartheid South Africa as a model. That would be a sharp departure from current-day Libya, where even the intellectuals who gather in Tripoli’s cafés in the evenings, over water pipes and espressos, shy away from political talk. When I ask Saif how much personal freedom he wants for Libyans, he says without pause: “Everything, of course.” Asked whether that includes the freedom to criticize leaders or organize against them, he cuts me short, saying: “I am talking about the level of freedom like in Holland.” 

That’s hard to imagine. His father’s authority as Brother Leader and Guide of the Revolution remains unimpeachable, and Libyans who challenge it can be jailed. But Saif believes his vision is not only possible, but inevitable. “Ask any Libyan,” he says. “They want an efficient and modern country. If you are against that, you are an idiot.”

In a country where most people have only ever known his father’s rule, Saif says Libyans have grown impatient for change. In February 2010, when President Gaddafi ended his one-year term as the head of the African Union, the organization passed a resolution giving itself the power to expel or impose sanctions on leaders who seize power through force. The message was not lost on Libyans. “In black Africa, we see real democracy, real elections, real parliaments, real constitutions,” Saif says. “Why don’t we have the same as them?”

One of the answers is that there are plenty of people who don’t want change. Libya’s powerful security organizations — often fingered by human-rights groups for conducting arbitrary arrests and torture — are resisting reforms.

Also opposed are members of the revolutionary committees, who have garnered wealth and political benefits through their close association with Libya’s leader.

At the same time, critics of Saif say that talk of serious change is merely a ruse. “It is all just a game,” says an exile who runs a website from London. “Saif cannot do anything without his dad’s blessing. They have a great relationship.” Skeptics point to Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad promised change but has brought few reforms since his father Hafez died in 2000.

In neighboring Egypt, Hosni Mubarak’s son Gamal could face a similar predicament if he runs in next year’s presidential elections.

Mindful of such pitfalls, Saif rejected his father’s proposal last year to assume the country’s second-highest post. “I would not accept [a position] because you need to have a constitution,” Saif says. “You need transparent political rules of the game.” He’s also prepared to test the system. Tensions erupted into full view last December after Saif invited the Washington and Middle East directors of Human Rights Watch to launch its report on Libya’s human-rights violations at a press conference in the heart of Tripoli. Few groups had ever been allowed to speak out publicly against the government, and security forces attempted to disrupt the event. Some Libyans scheduled to attend were blocked from traveling to the capital. Those who addressed the press conference and recounted heartrending tales of relatives killed in prison were shouted down by security officers in the audience, according to news reports. “There is no possibility for real political organizing, so people are chipping away at the corners,” says North African researcher for Human Rights Watch. Saif, she says, “is the only person who can stand up to his father.”

Sending Mixed Messages
Really standing up to Gaddafi will require confronting one of the strongest themes of his rule: opposition to the West. Despite the lifting of sanctions, Gaddafi’s ban on things such as English signage remains. Even the street signs to Tripoli’s international airport are in Arabic only. “In our cooperation with the U.S. and Europe, we are not serious enough, we send confusing messages,” Saif says.

But the West, and especially Washington, could also play a more active role in encouraging reforms. Washington promised billions of dollars of private investment to help revamp Libya’s economy if Tripoli dropped its nukes program. So far, interest has fallen far short of that. Libyans were also outraged when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security added the country to a security watch list after the attempted bombing of a plane over Detroit last December. “We extended a friendly hand and got slapped in the face,” Gebril says.

To Saif, nothing illustrates the divide with the West more starkly than Libya’s bizarre feud with Switzerland. It began when Gaddafi’s son (and Saif’s half brother) Hannibal and his wife were arrested in July 2008 in Geneva for allegedly assaulting their servants. Charges were dropped, but in the tit-for-tat battle that has run ever since, a Swiss businessman has been jailed in Tripoli, Libya has pulled billions from Swiss banks, and Switzerland has barred Gaddafi and other top Libyans from entering its country. In January, Libya blocked access to YouTube and several websites run by Libyan exiles, and in February it stopped handing out visas to most European citizens.

To all this, Saif sighs, clearly exasperated. “There is a big gap between … our mentality and the Western mentality,” he says. “I think we are not ready to deal in the right way with the Western world.” Not yet.

Gaddafi Eyeing Italian Women

 He came as the self-styled “emancipator of women”, the world’s longest-serving leader who makes much of his all-female bodyguard squad and favourable views towards the opposite sex. 

But to hundreds of baffled Italian women gathered for a rare audience with Muammar Gaddafi, if this was the king of women’s rights then the movement still has a long way to go.

Gaddafi’s request to meet 1,000 prominent Italian women on his landmark trip to Italy in June 2009 has generated scepticism and amusement in equal measure. In Berlusconi’s Italy, an all-female guest list has taken on a certain connotation.

But this wasn’t a crowd from a party villa. An exotic assemblage filed in. There were leading figures from politics, culture and industry, ministers posed for cameras, lawyers talked earnestly in their seats and Reality TV personalities blew kisses across the aisles.

Arriving on stage in flowing robes, Gaddafi assumed his seat and placed copies of his little green book in front of him. Mara Cafagna, a former topless model turned minister of equal opportunities kicked things off by describing the event as an “important day for relations between Italy and Libya“. Cafagna, who once described her experiences as Miss Italy as “a competition that makes you as a woman”, admirably espoused her new role as a figurehead of women’s rights, addressing female mutilation and domestic violence and saying how much she hoped Gaddafi’s presence would present “a strong clear message against the abuse of women”.

Gaddafi drummed his figures on the table, lounged back in his large leather chair and perused his little green book, occasionally beckoning one of his female bodyguards, who shuffled back and forth with drinks and boxes of tissues. “I am curious to see, to understand his point of view,” said Maria Gabriella, from Rome, “but with all these women working for him as semi slaves it seems a bit of a contradiction to call himself a liberator of women.”

On stage, Luisa Todini, an entrepreneur, said: “It might be easy to ask wonder why you have made this exclusive request to meet hundreds of Italian women.” With gravelly tones, Gaddafi responded by describing the various philosophical positions that have historically elevated men as superior.

“Not my philosophy,” he was quick to add.

But the colonel’s philosophy was about as elusive as an oasis in a Libyan desert. “There is no difference between men and women on a human level,” he exclaimed. “God made men and women, we must respect the differences between the sexes.”

Then it all went a bit wrong.Using a peculiar example of a steam train driver, Gaddafi called for “two systems” in the professional forum; “one suitable for men, the other for women”. Even the interpreter seemed a little bemused. He could be seen suppressing a few smiles and at one point made a gesture by tapping the side of his head.

With growing murmurs in the auditorium and a few noisy exits, Gaddafi tried to regain some credibility by denouncing the treatment of women in Arabic and Islamic societies.

“Why should these women have to apply to the head of state for the right to drive a car?” he asked. The audience applauded politely, but swiftly laughed incredulously as he went on to add that this was a matter for “their husbands or brothers should d ecide”. Boos and hisses filled the auditorium; there were whispers in ears and Gaddafi wrapped up quickly, welcoming all the foregathered to Libya “whenever we wished”.

Exeunt, in confusion. “I’m not sure I’ll take anything away from today,” said Vera, 23, from Rome. “It was out of this world,” said Luisa, who did not give her last name. “He really is on a different planet.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers