Durex New Condom Ad

Clip_15When Poonam Pandey attempts a ‘spoof’ on a new ad campaign within two days of its release, you know you have a winner on your hands. The ‘Do the Rex’ campaign featuring Bollywood young blood Ranveer Singh has gone viral on social media within a day of its release, with 1,50,000 views. The commercial, which literally begins with a ‘bang’ and a subsequent orgasm, has the actor gloating about the experience with a dance and a rap, written by the 28-year-old himself.

The attempt is a far cry from condom ads of yesteryear, with their cringe-worthily self-conscious erotic moves. The image of the homely woman with a come-hither twinkle in her eye has been replaced by the chiselled hunk who encourages you to carry a khushiyon ka chhata along. The mind behind the campaign, Partho Sinha of DigitasLBi, says that while the other campaigns began at passion and ended there, this campaign celebrates it. “The prime objective of the campaign was to demonstrate the idea that love and great sex are magical and we can enjoy the feeling without any apprehensions about practising safe sex.” It’s a novel way to approach and talk about sex, long considered a taboo by censor boards and looked askance at by norms of a society that is still somewhat tight-corseted under a loo­sening Victorian hold over it.

Clip_7The advertisement chooses its target audience carefully. The video was first uploaded on the internet with the intention of looking for a response from the youth, which has been “extremely positive”, says Nitish Kapoor, general manager, Reckitt Benckiser, the parent company of Durex. “Within a few days of its launch, the ad went viral on Facebook and Twitter despite the nation being gripped by elections and the IPL,” says Kapoor of a campaign he believes is “truly digital at heart and whose activation has actually taken place outside the realm of conventional media”. The lyrics of the song impressed Jinisha Bhanushali, a student from Goa, who says the commercial “attracts the youth and promotes condoms in an interesting way”.

Probably the first Bollywood star to back a condom brand, the fact that Ranveer also chose to break his proverbial hymen in the field of endorsements with this product has people talking. It’s a psychological fillip for the average guy who is used to that awkward sputter at the drugstore while purchasing ‘that thing’. The inclusion of the male heartthrob as the centrepiece also gives women no reason to complain, says Sumedha, an aspiring journalist from Delhi. “It’s fun, the message is simple and effective and there is no unn­ecessary objectification of the female body,” she says. Sumedha points at the distastefully sensuous and raunchy representation of women in condom ads. From a Sunny Leone writhing in skimpy corsets urging you to have sex anywhere you want, to a woman feeling herself up at the very sight of condoms, ads have objectified women for long.

Ranveer is mindful of that. “I was alw­ays clear that I wanted to endorse a product that truly has a positive impact on society and sends out the message of being socially responsible too,” he says in an interview.

The 127-second ‘Do the Rex’ video pulls away from traditional condom ads featuring coy, just-married couples or models with unreal bodies by dep­icting sex as a normal activity. The commercial will in its next series “focus on capitalising on this attempt at creating a tolerant space to discuss sex, and involving stakeholders…other than the youth,” says Sinha.

The risque lyrics and Ranveer’s joyously muscular cavorting may seem fri­volous and doubters may have issues with its message, but ‘Do the Rex’ unabashedly celebrates its unserious line.

Published by alaiwah

ALAIWAH'S PHILOSOPHY About 12 years ago, while studying Arabic in Cairo, I became friends with some Egyptian students. As we got to know each other better we also became concerned about each other’s way of life. They wanted to save my soul from eternally burning in hell by converting me to Islam. I wanted to save them from wasting their real life for an illusory afterlife by converting them to the secular worldview I grew up with. In one of our discussions they asked me if I was sure that there is no proof for God’s existence. The question took me by surprise. Where I had been intellectually socialized it was taken for granted that there was none. I tried to remember Kant’s critique of the ontological proof for God. “Fine,” Muhammad said, “but what about this table, does its existence depend on a cause?” “Of course,” I answered. “And its cause depends on a further cause?” Muhammad was referring to the metaphysical proof for God’s existence, first formulated by the Muslim philosopher Avicenna. Avicenna argues, things that depend on a cause for their existence must have something that exists through itself as their first cause. And this necessary existent is God. I had a counter-argument to that to which they in turn had a rejoinder. The discussion ended inconclusively. I did not convert to Islam, nor did my Egyptian friends become atheists. But I learned an important lesson from our discussions: that I hadn’t properly thought through some of the most basic convictions underlying my way of life and worldview — from God’s existence to the human good. The challenge of my Egyptian friends forced me to think hard about these issues and defend views that had never been questioned in the milieu where I came from. These discussions gave me first-hand insight into how deeply divided we are on fundamental moral, religious and philosophical questions. While many find these disagreements disheartening, I will argue that they can be a good thing — if we manage to make them fruitful for a culture debate. Can we be sure that our beliefs about the world match how the world actually is and that our subjective preferences match what is objectively in our best interest? If the truth is important to us these are pressing questions. We might value the truth for different reasons: because we want to live a life that is good and doesn’t just appear so; because we take knowing the truth to be an important component of the good life; because we consider living by the truth a moral obligation independent of any consequences; or because we want to come closer to God who is the Truth. Of course we wouldn’t hold our beliefs and values if we weren’t convinced that they are true. But that’s no evidence that they are. Weren’t my Egyptian friends just as convinced of their views as I was of mine? More generally: don’t we find a bewildering diversity of beliefs and values, all held with great conviction, across different times and cultures? If considerations such as these lead you to concede that your present convictions could be false, then you are a fallibilist. And if you are a fallibilist you can see why valuing the truth and valuing a culture of debate are related: because you will want to critically examine your beliefs and values, for which a culture of debate offers an excellent setting.

Leave a comment