ISI Lt Colonel Arrests 4 in Kashmir to Settle a Personal Dispute

It is common in Pakistan for the ISI personnel to settle their personal scores using their official clout.

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) based in HK has reported that four young men have been illegally arrested, detained and tortured by ISI officials because of a minor
personal dispute.

The first victim was allegedly taken hostage by an ISI colonel so that his uncle would pay a debt, and the other three were friends of the victim who inquired about him at the local police station. Three of the young men are still being held incommunicado and
according to the fourth, who was released after six days, they have
all been badly tortured by officials in a secluded place. The released victim is in ill health and has been warned against publicising the details of his friends’ capture by the perpetrators. Although civilians in Muzaffarabad have held protest rallies, no action has yet been taken by the authorities.

Leave a Comment

Together, We Can End Child Prostitution.

Right now, children are falling prey to sex trafficking in American-owned hotels all over the world, and even right here at home.

Just in November 2009, 5-year-old Shaniya Davis was sold for sex at a Comfort Inn in North Carolina.

Companies like Choice Hotels, the parent company of the Comfort Inn where Shaniya was sold, have the power to help prevent this kind of tragedy.

Send a letter to Choice Hotels asking them to prevent child prostitution.

Choice Hotels can help prevent child prostitution with one simple action: signing the Code of Conduct (www.thecode.org). More than 900 companies around the world (very few of them from the U.S.) have been willing to take this simple, effective action.

By refusing to commit to eradicating child sex trafficking, American-owned hotels are signaling their indifference to the plight of children.

Beginning in  2004, the major U.S.-based hotel chains are repeatedly being asked to sign the Code of Conduct.

Carlson Companies — owners of Radisson, Country Inn & Suites, and others — proudly declared their commitment to protecting children.

A few others made some positive steps, but ultimately failed to embrace the full range of actions they can and should take. Choice Hotels has not returned correspondence regarding the recent tragedy at one of their hotels or outlined the steps they intend to take to prevent what happened to Shaniya from happening to other girls. Why won’t Choice Hotels prevent child prostitution?

The most shocking thing about the pimping of Shaniya Davis for sex at a North Carolina Choice Hotels property is that this is not the first child prostitution scandal the brand has faced.

Earlier this year, a 14-year-old girl was reported to have been forced into prostitution at a Quality Inn in Ontario, also owned by Choice. In Pittsburg, law enforcement agents caught one man trying to buy sex with a 10-year-old girl in the parking lot of another Quality Inn. Given these troublesome incidents, you would think Choice Hotels would want to address this problem before it grows. How many more children must be sold on their properties before they take action?

You can take action to prevent child prostitution by sending a letter to Choice Hotels CEO Steve Joyce, telling him to sign the Code of Conduct and commit to preventing child sex tourism in Choice Hotel hotels. 

Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Indian Gujarat Prohibition Policy Only Hurting the People

The hooch tragedy which has killed more than 150 people in the Indian Gujarat recently needs our attention.

I want to remind you thatour state Gujarat is already on the hit list of terrorists and because of the liquor prohibition policy of our state govt. daily thousands of bottles in trucks of English liquor illegally made in our neighboring states and are supplied to our state.

This network is operated by liquor bootleggers and mafias who can fall into the hands of terrorists at any time. The terrorists can supply a lot of poisonous liquor and can kill a large number of innocent people and this will be comparatively easy and effective way for them.

There is a need to establish responsibility as to who will be responsible for the accident if it takes place.  The govt is responsible for the liquor prohibition policy; therefore, the mafia cannot smuggle liquor into the state without the cooperation of corrupt politicians and bureaucrats.

I request you to accept my request as a PIL and give the right directives to the govt to avoid any major accident.

In this regard, kindly also consider the following:

[1] Though the liquor prohibition policy is in force in Gujarat but three times more liquor is being sold here compared to any other state of India .

[2] Local gujarat govt justifies this policy by saying that because this is the Gandhi’s Gujarat therefore we implemented this policy  on moral grounds. But today we have to think that who they are to say that Gujarat’s Gandhi or Gandhi’s Gujarat. Gandhi is the father of nation and whole nation is Gandhi’s. Gandhi struggled for whole India and he never said that he is for Gujarat or Gujarat is for him.  Gandhi never taught us that the lesson to move on morality is by crushing humanity.

[3] There are so many people here in society who don’t drink so they like and support this policy. So the time has come to explain them that due to this policy the crime and corruption and diseases our society gets, they also can be victim of these things because this policy does not give any thing except crime and corruption to the general public of the society.

[4] The transaction of millions of rupees has been criminalized which money moves within the liquor mafia and corrupted officers and politicians only. If this policy is demolished the same money will come in the market to the businessmen and even youths will get a new field to earn and get employment.

[5] In the name of country liquor which liquor is being made and being sold here, millions of people are drinking that is made by car battary’s acid, detergent soaps water, saltpeter(anum) or ( FITKARI),and Gud(brown sugar).

Drinking such liquor can be harmful. This liquor causes the liver diseases, tuberculosis, and other so many skin diseases also.

[6] This is the totally failed and unsuccessful policy which violates our religious and human rights because we Hindus think we have the right to worship our god Kal Bhairav but we cant do so because liquor is required to worship the same god.

We cant get liquor because of this Islamic policy is implemented on our heads.

There are 5 crore people living in Gujarat state in which about thirty percent people consume liquor.

Still the liquor prohibition policy is in force there. Due to this policy now you can imagine how a big number of people is consuming the poisonous liquor regularly and how big damage the society is bearing due to this policy.

This is the policy which does not give anything to society but only crime corruption and diseases. We request all the electronic and print media to understand the seriousness of this matter and give the coverage to us and our voice.

But we are neglected everywhere only because we have no big funds to advertise ourself.

Innocent people of Gujarat are bearing the torture of this policy and are drinking poison with keeping mum because they don’t know where to go and whom to ask for their help.

But your ignorance to us and such policy of killing the innocents with slow poison will make us more nervous.

If this policy is demolished, and due to that the government gets the revenue from liquor business, by that money government can give at least one kg sugar every month to every poor or middle class family in the state, so I wish to state that please ask the govt on the liquor prohibition policy, assessing the relevancy and profit and losses to the society.

Because today the time has come to tell the people that this policy does not give any thing except the crime, corruption and diseases, deaths of innocents to the society. And only corrupted bureaucrats, politicians, and liquor mafias are enjoying this policy.

I request you to keep secret my identity to you.

Jitendra Sharma

Naranpura

Ahmedabad 63

Letter to c.j.of guj high court

Leave a Comment

Situation will not Improve Until Intelligence Agencies Put Under Civilian Control

http://material.ahrchk.net/hrreport/2009/

The AHRC will soon publish an annual report on Pakistan for 2009. A prepublication report of the version can be downloaded at:
http://material.ahrchk.net/hrreport/2009/AHRC-SPR-006-2009-Pakistan-HRReport2009.pdf
 
When we look at the extent of the suffering that Pakistanis have undergone in 2009,  we are reminded that this is not a day for celebration, butone on which to press for serious change; for the legislation that has yet to be passed or put into practice. We are reminded of how far there is to go.

The human rights situation remains deplorable in Pakistan, even though the government has, through changes in law, made attempts to improve the situation.

On a positive note, the government has restored the
judiciary that was disbanded by General Musharraf in 2007, and it has proposed the release of the hundreds of political prisoners
languishing, rightless, in Balochistan. It has passed two bills
regarding the status of women. One is a women’s protection bill for
the prevention of domestic violence and the provision of aid and
services to its victims.

The second bill will allow harsher punishments for those who commit sexual harassment, and will expand the definition of the crime to facilitate prosecutions. However it is important to remember that while these changes in legislation are undoubtedly commendable, the true test lies in their application in
the everyday lives of Pakistani civilians, and their impact on the
attitudes and values on both government agents and people. Legislature is of no value if it does not impact the underlying issues which make for these problems.

The unbridled power of the military over the civilian establishment
has been a key feature in confronting challenges to the status quo,
and the continuing prevalence of brutality without redress in
Pakistani society and politics.

There had been hopes that following the ousting of Musharraf, the resulting democratic elections and the re-instatement of the judiciary, the human rights situation in the country would improve. The serious escalation of the conflict between state
and militant Islamic forces has given rise to one of the region’s –
and the world’s — most dangerous security and human rights
situations. Extremely high levels of violence and terrorism have been accompanied by political wrangling, and the continuing weakening of Pakistan’s civilian institutions and mechanisms of its rule of law.

The military operations in Balochistan and NWFP have been responsible for the extra-judicial killings of several hundred persons, including women and children. Disappearances
have become a popular way for state intelligence agencies to curb
voices of dissent.

A vast civilian challenge is to find the courage to tackle the military owned intelligence agencies for the recovery of such persons, or at least get information about them. The government has recovered just 20 persons out of hundreds who have been disappeared, and many cases point strongly to the involvement of state forces. The government itself has said this year that 1102 persons have been disappeared from a single province, Balochistan.

In November, a separate Human Rights Ministry was established and in April 2008, Pakistan ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as the UN Convention against Torture. However in May the government announced that Pakistan would accede to the International Convention on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance, but has not done so as yet. On 15
October, the cabinet approved a draft bill to set up a National Human Rights Commission but Parliament has not yet passed the bill as yet.

This International human rights day must be seen as one in which a new era of respect for personhood, for the fundamental importance of a strengthened humanity, is forged. The government must ratify and then thoroughly implement the core international human rights instruments.

Perhaps the most pressing concern in relation to this protection is the issue of torture. No serious effort has been made towards the elimination of torture in prisons, police stations and military interrogations, and it has become endemic in this society. Pakistan has signed CAT but never discussed these issues in a legal forum, including that of Parliament. The AHRC has pointed out that there are at least 52 torture cells run under the Pakistan Army in different cities. This statistic was collected from torture victims after their release. There is a strong need for Pakistan government to acknowledge this deplorable situation, wherein untried civilians are being mentally, emotionally and physically annihilated.

Immediate action must be taken to dismantle and rebuild the systems which have allowed for this to happen, which include, but are not limited to the corruption in the policing system.

The AHRC calls for the establishment of a credible, independent body to investigate claims of torture. All enquiries that are conducted should be transparent.

The AHRC urges that adequate measures are taken to ensure the
protection and safety of victims or witnesses who give evidence, and we call for investigation into claims of threats by governmental agents against witnesses or victims. Steps must be taken immediately to ensure appropriate legal sanctioning of the government agents responsible.

The government must also turn its attention to the pressing and
distressing situation on the rights of women.

Since corruption, negligence and the preference of personal gain over professional duty has become so deeply embedded into the justice system of Pakistan, it is clear that these systems of (in)justice must be dismantled and rebuilt from the ground up in order to facilitate a new order, in which respect and dignity can be realized for all people in all sections of society.

The AHRC urges the government to realize that the situation of human rights violations cannot be improved until and unless the state intelligence agencies are put under civilian control, that in true meaning, are running their parallel government. The government should also disband all the torture cells run by the military and its intelligence agencies in the cantonment areas in the different parts of the country.
# # #
About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

Comments (1)

Zardari Makes Fun of Shaheen Sehbai Holding a US Passport

by Shaheen Sehbai

When an elected head of the state, who is also the head of the largest political party of the country, the Supreme Commander of the country’s armed forces and (at least on papers) the man with his finger on the country’s nuclear button, cannot venture out of his bunker in the presidency, a five-star prison of sorts, and attacks a TV channel, a newspaper editor or a talk show anchor, he must be seriously in trouble or scared to death with insecurity.

It was a great day in my professional career to get so much attention on live TV, nationally and throughout the world, with the country’s president talking about me (why did you not name me) in a furiously threatening tone, foaming and frothing as if he would shoot me if I had been somewhere close to him at the time.

I have just landed in Washington to spend a few days with my family on Eid ul Azha and the first thing I hear on TV is my head of state calling me names. It was a unique welcome to the festival of sacrifices.

I heard Asif Ali Zardari’s speech, his first major political address in months, which dealt with no other burning issue of the country, many times wanting to find out what message he had for the country, other than saying that he was a brave man, he was ready to offer sacrifices and he would not be coweddown and would prefer to leave in an ambulance rather than walk out of the presidency under duress.

Here is the strongest man in the country so rattled by a few reports and articles by me, or a few talk shows by Dr Shahid Masood, that he forgets to mention anything about the infamous NRO, the shame of the Kerry Lugar Bill, the gross charges of corruption, money laundering or misuse of power against him and his cronies. He did not mention the issues of sugar, atta, electricity and unemployment. He did not praise the soldiers and people fighting the deadly terrorists. He and his few people now sharing power were only worried about their own fate, with the loud spoken Zulfikar Mirza declaring to the world that he would use the Sindh Card, if worse comes to worst.

Zardari referred to me by frequently mentioning someone with “an American passport”. He also said I was not a Pakistani national. He has to get his facts right. But carrying an American passport is not something he would like to turn into a disqualification as bulk of his own cronies are exiles who have acquired foreign passports, including US passports, and they would be the ones to jump the ship first. I am a Pakistani and work in Pakistan and will continue to do so.

His biggest accusation against me was that I wanted him “to leave the presidency in an ambulance”. I think he knows better as he has been telling many who meet him in his bunker that he would not quit and people will have to take him out.

President Zardari will have to either step down with dignity, hand over his presidential powers to the PM through a fast-track constitutional amendments process, or become a figurehead and stay within his bunker for as long as he does not create any nuisance. This does not mean his murder, though it could mean a political suicide.

His party leaders have also been objecting to my use of the word ‘martyr’ for Zardari and one Minister, Dr Babar Awan, had the temerity to ask me in a TV show to name the people who would kill Zardari, as if I had been plotting his murder or martyrdom with these people. There has to be a limit to sycophancy and toadyism.

My words in my Nov 7 article were: “Zardari will have to make his decision very quickly on whether he wants to exit with dignity or become a martyr. The days, as they say, are in fact numbered.” It is clear for anyone who understands English what is meant here is a ‘political martyr’ and not dead in the physical sense. If someone cannot understand the language, a very handy Prof Husain Haqqani can help any time.

Other than these references in Zardari’s speech about me, what I can guess is that he is rattled because I have been criticising his style of governance, his failures in taking successful political decisions, his U-Turns at every critical time, his arrogance and stubbornness and lately his indecent manner of speech with his own prime minister.

Neither the president nor the PM have denied any of the contents of my article about Zardari using insulting words against Gilani. In fact, my sources say, when PM Gilani was asked about my article and whether there was a tiff between him and the president, Gilani’s diplomatic reply was: “I am not angry with the president.” He decided not to comment on what he had heard from Zardari and in what tone.

It is the right of every writer and journalist to criticise the rulers on their policies, their decisions and their actions. This is exactly what I have been doing during my 42-year-long career. I have criticised every ruler, without fear or favour and whenever the political rulers were out of office and struggling to come back, I happened to be one of their most favorite journalists and had even developed personal friendships with them. This is also true in the case of Zardari.

When he was arrested in 1990 by Jam Sadiq Ali and thrown in the Landhi jail, I and my friends Nusrat Javeed, Mohammad Malick, Shakil Sheikh and a couple of others had confronted Jam Sadiq and forced him to allow us to visit him in the jail. That was the first move in his political comeback. Then I wrote a series of seven articles in which I had questioned Ghulam Ishaq Khan and Jam Sadiq. When in 1993 Benazir and Zardari again came to power, he offered me political jobs and only one journalist, Azhar Sohail, accepted his offer. Sadly he then paid for his life and his family’s ruination three years later.

Once again when Zardari was in power I wrote against his corruption in 1994-95 and then as well he had threatened me and others. I did what I had to do then and faced the consequences.

It was Zardari and Benazir Bhutto who became very friendly to me during their days of wilderness in the Nawaz Sharif/Musharraf eras. In his years in New York, Zardari was particularly friendly and even attended my son’s wedding in Washington. He should be ashamed of now pointing accusing fingers at me for holding a US passport. Can’t he come up with anything better to accuse me? What he was doing in US himself during all those years is also known to people who were in the knowledge. My fault is that I again refused his offer to join his government in 2008 although it is totally wrong that I was ever offered to become Pakistan Ambassador in Canada. Neither had I ever asked him for a political or diplomatic job.

His speech was 90 per cent rhetoric, based on shallow looking claims of pursuing Bhuttoism and the rest 10 per cent was attacks on me, Geo TV and Dr Shahid Masood.

If his corruption, amassed wealth and grabbed lands are questioned, it is pure and simple journalism in the interest of the people and the country and no one can deny us that right. He says he will not listen to any criticism except from his political rivals. What a lame statement is that. Where does he place the others pillars of state, the judiciary, the media, the civil society, the ‘ghairat’ and ‘izzat’ brigades? His political colleagues are easy for him to handle because many of them are in the same boat of looted wealth and plundered resources. But he will have to listen to all of us and hiding in a bunker while claiming to be a brave man, will not wash away his sins or wish us away from the scene.

Comments (3)

Minaret Ban in Switzerland

The peace lovers and promoters of Interfaith Dialogue, all over the world met a set-back , when Swiss government banned construction of minarets , the slender towers attached to mosques, after the most controversial Referendum (29 Nov), in the history of Switzerland ever.

The Swiss government invariably prompted the other countries to take similar actions against the minority religions on the demand of the public and its pressure . The accusation of the Swiss People’s Party, the largest party in the Swiss parliament, that minarets can be divisive political symbols and signs of an increasing Islamic presence in Switzerland  is absurd and without any reasoning.

The architectural designs are not aimed at promoting any ‘ism’ in general or Islamization in particular. Journalists For International Peace supports the stance of The Swiss Council of Religions, which includes Jewish, Christian and Muslim leaders- It issued a statement rejecting the call for the ban. In a statement, Catholic bishops said the ban would hinder interreligious dialogue and that Swiss building codes already regulate the construction and operation of minarets.

The Catholic Church met similar opposition in 1832 when it wanted to build a huge bell tower for the Valentin Church in predominantly Protestant Lausanne. It was another century before the church was allowed its tower.

Switzerland only has two small minarets, one in Zurich and one in Geneva. It is pointed out that mosques in Switzerland tend to be found in old warehouses and factories and the largest mosque in the Swiss capital, Bern, is in a former underground parking garage.

Thecontroversial referendum, on purely a religious matter, is against the international democratic norms, Universal Declaration of Human Rights and and the UN Charter.

The ban will instigate various religious groups to pressurize their respective governments to impose similar bans . The decision of the Swiss Government will further widen the gulf between Muslims and other religions. It will personify a conspiracy against the non-Muslim communities, residing as the minorities in Muslim countries.

It is therefore requested to lift the ban on the construction of the minarets attached with mosques, promote the Interfaith Dialogue, restore the confidence of Muslims of Switzerland and create a conducive atmosphere for mutual harmony and Peace.

Iftikhar Chaudri
President
Journalists For International Peace
president@j4http://www.facebook.com/l/3ca89;ip.org

Leave a Comment

Americans Love Zardari

A military coup is unfolding in Pakistan, but, this time, there is no
rumbling of tanks on the streets of Islamabad. Instead, it seems the
military is using a new strategy for regime change in Pakistan, one
that will have adverse consequences for Western troops deployed in Afghanistan.

A year after rogue elements of Pakistan’s intelligence services
disrupted Indian-Pakistani peace talks by staging the Mumbai massacre, the democratically elected government of President Asif Zardari is facing a putsch from within its ranks, engineered by the men who run Pakistan’s infamous military-industrial complex.

The men who wish to replace Mr. Zardari represent the religious
right-wing backers of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, adding a new obstacle in Barack Obama’s war effort in Afghanistan.

In the West’s war against terrorism, Mr. Zardari is probably the only politician in Pakistan who has the guts to identify the cancer of jihadi extremism and order the Pakistani army to root it out. With reluctance, the army has complied, but only half-heartedly. With him gone, it’s almost a certainty that Canada and the United States, as well as Afghanistan and India, will once more face the deception and fraud that became the hallmark of Pervez Musharraf’s military regime.

For years, the Pakistani army received billions of dollars in direct
American aid while it backed the Taliban and staged faked armed
encounters to deceive the Pentagon.

The army views the government’s efforts at peace with both Afghanistan and India not only with suspicion but also with alarm. Peace with India would undermine the very raison d’être of Pakistan’s massive military.

The army’s patience with Mr. Zardari ran out in October, when the U.S. Congress passed the Kerry-Lugar bill that promised billions in aid to Pakistan, but with a crucial caveat: The money would go through the channels of the civilian administration and if the military interfered with the democratic process or bullied the politicians and the judiciary, the Americans would halt all aid to the military.

The generals were in an uproar. Having lived their entire lives with a sense of entitlement that rivalled medieval caliphs and emperors, the men in uniform started a campaign to dislodge Mr. Zardari and his ambassador in Washington, Husain Haqqani – the authors, they said, of their misfortune.

Addicted to the billions in U.S. aid that have made them among the
wealthiest in their impoverished country, Pakistan’s generals are in a Catch-22. If they overthrow the government, they risk losing the manna from America. If they do nothing, they lose their veto over government policymaking, domestic as well as foreign.Stung by this loss of power, the generals have asked the pro-Taliban media to whip up an anti-U.S. and anti-India frenzy in the country, claiming that Mr. Zardari has sold out to the Americans and the Indians.

Mr. Zardari also is being depicted as the epitome of corruption and
thus unworthy of governing Pakistan. Working from within the
government, military intelligence was able to coax a junior minister to release a list of thousands of supposedly corrupt politicians and public officials in the country. Leading them was Mr. Zardari himself – notwithstanding the fact that before he was elected president, he had been imprisoned for more than a decade by the military without a single conviction.

What irks the generals is not just that they are now answerable to a
civilian but that Mr. Zardari belongs to an ethnic group that is
shunned by the country’s ruling Punjabi elite. Mr. Zardari is a
Sindhi.

The hysteria among Pakistan’s upper-class elites demanding a military dictatorship is best reflected in an article written by a retired military officer in the right-wing newspaper The News: “Military rule should … return. … The problem with democratic governments is that they remain under pressure to go with what the majority of the citizens want, not what is best for them. … People of several South American countries that have returned to civilian rule after a long time are now beginning to feel they were better off under dictatorships.”

If  Obama wishes to succeed in bringing the Afghan war to an end, he had better make sure Zardari’s elected civilian administration
is allowed to govern until the end of its term. A coup in Islamabad
will mean failure in Kabul.

————— 

Tarek Fatah is a former activist in Pakistan and founder of the
Muslim Canadian Congress. He is author of Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State
<
http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=195344282507&h=264c61c6b0cccac15096eced7d4e8842&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.averroespress.com%2FAverroesPress%2FChasing-a-Mirage.html>

Comments (1)

Heroics of Taj Hotel’s Staff in Mumbai

October 10, 2009

Meeting with H N Srinivas – Senior Executive Vice President, Taj Group of Hotels  

Last evening, I had a dinner meeting with HNS in Goa (I was there for a National Institute of Personnel Management conference – as a speaker).

He narrated the 26th November 2008 terror attack on Taj Mumbai and there were some important points.

A. Terrorist entry

1. They entered from the Leopold Colaba hotel entrance and also from the northern entrance – spraying indiscriminate bullets on the Taj security personnel and guests in general. 

2. Though Taj had a reasonable security – they were surely not equipped to deal with terrorists who were spraying 6 bullets per trigger.

3. The strategy of the terrorists was to throw chunks of RDX in an open area that will explode and burn – creating chaos so that the guests and staff run helter skelter so that the terrorists could kill them. The idea was to create maximum casualties.

4. There were several critical gatherings and functions happening in the hotel on that day – a Bohra wedding, global meet of Unilever CEOs and Board members and 2 other corporate meetings were being held in the hotel – besides the usual crowd.

5. The firing and chaos began at about 8.30 p.m. and the staff including employees on casual and contract basis displayed exemplary presence of mind, courage and sacrifice to protect the guests who were in various halls and conference rooms.

B. Stories of Staff Heroics 

 1. A young lady guest relation executive with the HLL gathering stopped any of the members going out and volunteered 3 times to go out and get stuff such as ice cubes for whiskey of the guests when the situation outside the hall was very explosives and she could have been easily the target of the bullets

 2. Thomas George a captain escorted 54 guests from a backdoor staircase and when he was going down last he was shot by the terrorists

3. There were 500 emails from various guests narrating heroics of the staff and thanking them for saving their lives

4. In a subsequent function, Ratan Tata broke down in full public view and sobbed saying – “the company belongs to these people”. The wife of Thomas George who laid his life saving others said, she and the kids were proud of the man and that she did not know that for 25 years she lived with a man who was so courageous and brave

5. The episode happened on 26th November, a significant part of the hotel was burnt down and destroyed – the hotel was re-opened on 21st December and all the employees of the hotel were paraded in front of the guests

6. It was clearly a saga of extra-ordinary heroics by ordinary people for their organisation and in a way for their country. The sense of duty and service was unprecedented 

7. The young lady who protected and looked after the HLL guests was a management trainee and we often speak of juniority and seniority in the organisation. She had no instructions from any supervisor to do what she did

      a. She took just 3 minutes to rescue the entire team through the kitchen

      b. Cars were organised outside the hotel as per seniority of the members

      c. In the peak of the crisis, she stepped out and got the right wine glass for the guest

8. People who exhibited courage included janitors, waiters, directors, artisans and captains – all level of people 

C. The Tata Gesture

1. All category of employees including those who had completed even 1 day as casuals were treated on duty during the time the hotel was closed

2. Relief and assistance to all those who were injured and killed

3. The relief and assistance was extended to all those who died at the railway station, surroundings including the “Pav-Bhaji” vendor and the pan shop owners

4. During the time the hotel was closed, the salaries were sent my money order

5. A psychiatric cell was established in collaboration with Tata Institute of Social Sciences to counsel those who needed such help

6. The thoughts and anxieties going on people’s mind was constantly tracked and where needed psychological help provided

7. Employee outreach centers were opened where all help, food, water, sanitation, first aid and counseling was provided. 1600 employees were covered by this facility

8. Every employee was assigned to one mentor and it was that person’s responsibility to act as a “single window” clearance for any help that the person required

9. Ratan Tata personally visited the families of all the 80 employees who in some manner – either through injury or getting killed – were affected.

10. The dependents of the employees were flown from outside Mumbai to Mumbai and taken care off in terms of ensuring mental assurance and peace. They were all accommodated in Hotel President for 3 weeks

11. Ratan Tata himself asked the families and dependents – as to what they wanted him to do.

12. In a record time of 20 days, a new trust was created by the Tatas for the purpose of relief of employees. 

 13. What is unique is that even the other people, the railway employees, the police staff, the pedestrians who had nothing to do with Tatas were covered by compensation. Each one of them was provided subsistence allowance of Rs. 10K per month for all these people for 6 months.

14. A 4 year old granddaughter of a vendor got 4 bullets in her and only one was removed in the Government hospital. She was taken to Bombay hospital and several lacs were spent by the Tatas on her to fully recover her

15. New hand carts were provided to several vendors who lost their carts

16. Tata will take responsibility of life education of 46 children of the victims of the terror

17. This was the most trying period in the life of the organisation. Senior managers including Ratan Tata were visiting funeral to funeral over the 3 days that were most horrible

18. The settlement for every deceased member ranged from Rs. 36 to 85 lacs in addition to the following benefits:

       a. Full last salary for life for the family and dependents

       b. Complete responsibility of education of children and dependents – anywhere in the world

       c. Full Medical facility for the whole family and dependents for rest of their life

       d. All loans and advances were waived off – irrespective of the amount

       e. Counselor for life for each person

D. Epilogue

1. How was such passion created among the employees? How and why did they behave the way they did?

2. The organisation is clear that it is not something that someone can take credit for. It is not some training and development that created such behaviour. If someone suggests that – everyone laughs  

3. It has to do with the DNA of the organisation, with the way Tata culture exists and above all with the situation that prevailed that time. The organisation has always been telling that customers and guests are #1 priority

4. The hotel business was started by Jamshedji Tata when he was insulted in one of the British hotels and not allowed to stay there.

5. He created several institutions which later became icons of progress, culture and modernity. IISc is one such institute. He was told by the rulers that time that he can acquire land for IISc to the extent he could fence the same. He could afford fencing only 400 acres.

6. When the HR function hesitatingly made a very rich proposal to Ratan – he said – do you think we are doing enough?

7. The whole approach was that the organisation would spend several hundred crore in re-building the property – why not spend equally on the employees who gave their life?  

Minuted by Dileep Ranjekar

Comments (1)

Pakistan Has Done Little to Shut Down Lashkare Toiba

Among all the sensational details emerging from the terrorism charges against David Coleman Headley, the American national charged with involvement in 2008’s terrorist attack in Mumbai, it’s easy to miss this one: Headley is alleged to have been working for the Pakistani terrorist group Lashkare Taiba (LeT).

For intelligence experts in Washington, however, the LeT connection may be the most sensational allegation of them all — if the charges against Headley hold up, it will mean that the “Army of the Righteous,” originally dedicated to neighborhood jihad, is now ready to take on the world.

In charges unsealed on Dec 7, 2009, U.S. prosecutors claim that Headley, who changed his name from Daood Gilani, traveled to Bombay several times between 2006 and 2008, photographing and videotaping some of the targets that were hit last November in a three-day rampage by 10 LeT gunmen that left 166 people dead. Headley is also accused of carrying out surveillance for a plot to attack the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which sparked outrage across the Muslim world in 2005 by publishing cartoons mocking the Prophet Muhammad.

Upon Headley’s arrest at Chicago’s O’Hare airport in October, investigators said his luggage contained surveillance videos of the newspaper’s office building. (A second Chicago resident, Tawahar Rana, a Canadian national of Pakistani origin, was also arrested in connection with the Danish plot.)

The intelligence experts are alarmed by the Danish plot, believing that it indicates that LeT is no longer confining its targets to India. There are strong indications that [LeT] is looking to expand its reach beyond its traditional areas of interest.

Unlike al-Qaeda, which was created as a global movement, LeT started out focused on localized nationalist goals. It was formed in the late 1980s as one of several Pakistan-based groups formed to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Many of these groups received training and funding from the ISI, with the tacit approval of the U.S.

After the Soviets left Afghanistan, LeT in the early 1990s switched its focus to Kashmir, where it served as a convenient proxy for the Pakistani military and intelligence services to wage war on India.

LeT fighters initially crossed the Line of Control dividing Kashmir to attack Indian military and civilian targets. By 2000, they were venturing much farther into India, launching terrorist attacks in New Delhi.

Even then, LeT got little attention from Western intelligence agencies. The 9/11 attacks forced U.S. agencies to focus on extremist groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and after a Dec. 13, 2001, LeT strike on the Indian Parliament, the Bush Administration pressured Pakistan to ban the group. But Pakistani officials did little to stop the group from simply adopting a new name and continuing as before.

In the intervening years, LeT struck in New Delhi, Bombay and other cities, and Western intelligence agencies began to note the appearance of LeT operatives in Chechnya, Iraq and even Sudan. The group’s fundraising activities in North America drew attention in 2006, when two Georgia men (one of Pakistani origin, the other of Bangladeshi origin) were arrested in Toronto for providing material support to terrorist groups, including LeT. The two men are alleged to have been casing potential targets in Washington, including the Capitol and the World Bank. It was clear by then that LeT was no longer just India’s problem.

LeT’s desire to strike at the West was clear in the Mumbai attack, whose targets — two five-star hotels and a Jewish center — were places in which it would be sure to kill many Westerners. Six Americans were among the victims. Mumbai showed that the LeT has adoptedthe targets of the global Islamic jihad: ‘Crusaders and Zionists.

Stopping them won’t be easy. LeT continues to enjoy close association with the ISI wing of the Pakistani military. An attack on LeT unilaterally would certainly exacerbate tensions with Islamabad further, given that LeT is the most loyal of the jihadi groups to the Pakistani state.

And attacks on the group by remote-controlled drones or special forces are harder to pull off because LeT’s bases and training camps are in Punjab and Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, a long way from the current theater of U.S. covert operations along the Afghan border.

The only realistic weapon the U.S. has against LeT is whatever is left of Washington’s leverage over Islamabad. Pakistani authorities, under intense U.S. pressure, arrested several LeT members after the Mumbai attacks and briefly placed movement founder Hafiz Saeed under house arrest. Although a Pakistani court last month indicted seven men in connection with the Mumbai attack, Indian and American officials say Islamabad has done little to shut down LeT.

Leave a Comment

Durand Line Should be Redrawn on Ethnic Lines

by Tarique Khan Javed

President, Overseas Pakistani Investors Forum

Pakistan at a cross road

Some think that Pakistan will not survive, as it is and will be cut to size which will mean only the plains of Sindh and Punjab will form Pakistan; while rest will break away. There are others like me, who think a historical opportunity for Pakistan to expand west wards has arrived, to become a significant power of the world. 

An opportunity for Pakistan

The departure of Western forces from Afghanistan will compel Pakistan to move westward and take over all Pakhtun belt in Afghanistan comprising Kabul, Jalalabad, Khandahar, Helmond and Farah provinces upto the Turkmenistan border. This will reduce Afghanistan, to the areas now occupied by Northern Alliance forces comprising areas inhibited by Hazaras, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Turkmen etc. It will also cut its land connection with Iran. 

Historically, Iran and India have always divided Afghanistan between them equally. While Kabul, Khandahar, Farah was always with the Mughal or earlier Muslim Rulers, many of them Pakhtuns, rest of Afghanistan was under the influence of Iran. In areas dominated by Iran Persian language and culture held sway while the rest retained its Pashto language and traditions. Most Pakhtun, who are dire hard Sunnis, always treated Iranians as decadent people, following a loose version of Islam. Thus they found co-habitation with them impossible. On the other hand the Sunni Muslim rulers of India were much more acceptable to them as they were co followers of their faith and always gave a lion share of the government to Pakhtuns, even if the top leadership was with Mughal. 

First and last Afghan Kingdom

For the first time in 2000 year recorded history an independent Afghanistan under Durranis arose in 1747 and lasted  till 1957 or 210 years  as Kingship and later as a Republic for  22 years till it was taken over by the Soviets in 1979. The Sikh rule started around 1790 lasted for only 156 years till it was ended by British rule in 1846. 

Since 1988 when the Soviets left, Afghanistan is trying to find a basis of continuing as a nation. The tragic fact is that the nation is overwhelmingly dominated by Pakhtun who not only comprise 50% of the population but are also the only martial race of the nation. They always dominated and ruled without giving any significant share to lesser tribes like Hazaras, Tajiks, Uzbeks, whom they considered inferior not only because they were mostly Shias but also because they considered them less manly and thus not deserving respect. 

Between 1989 and 1995 a civil war of high intensity continued in Afghanistan during with Pakhtun leaders like Hikmatyar tried their best, in the name of Islam, to capture Kabul and rule all over Afghanistan but Tajik leaders like Ahmed Shah Masood and Uzbek leaders like Rashid Dustam resisted fiercely and Kabul was completely destroyed. Hikmatyar was backed by Pakistan yet he failed. Muslim brotherhood was unable to over come the tribal, religious and linguistic differences. 

Rise of Taliban

Fed up of the unending civil war, Pakistan tried to open the route from Chaman to Turkmenistan by taking a large convey through in 1994. When resisted by Orakzai tribe near Herat, local Talibs (Madarsa students) were hired and armed to help open the route rather pay the heavy sum demanded by the tribesmen. With Pak army backing these untrained volunteers succeeded. The success in the operation led to creation of Taliban. Taliban with their firm discipline, simple message of restoration of law and order, implementation of Shariah laws and support of Pakistan Army succeeded in ending the resistance of Northern Alliance. They captured and ruled over the whole of Afghanistan from 1995 till Nov 2001 when USA forced them out of power following 9/11 and established a government mainly headed by Northern Alliance, although, Hamid Karzai was kept as a figure head to appease the Pakhtun population. Pakhtun reject this kind of power sharing and have kept on their resistance in the name of Taliban, to the extent that Western forces are now exhausted and want to leave in three years. 

Division of Afghanistan on ethnic lines

In order to avoid what happened after Soviet withdrawal it is pertinent that Afghanistan be divided between Pakhtun and rest of the tribes. So that Pakhtun take the East and South of the country while rest goes to others. 

If this is not done an unending civil war in post war Afghanistan is inevitable. Now the Northern Alliance is much stronger than they were in 1994 and will resist strongly Pakhtun attempts to once again dominate them. Pakhtun based on history will fight to take control of all of Afghanistan and impose their moral system and power sharing on previous basis. This time around the Northern Alliance will be actively and openly supported by India, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and above all Iran. While Pakhtun may bank on only covert support of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States like UAE. West will probably remain neutral or support both parties equally. Thus this is a recipe for an extended conflict in which none of the parties can hope to win and dominate. 

UN must act to avoid disaster

To avoid these dire consequences it is pertinent that the World should sit together under the UN and decide to extend the current Durand Line west ward to incorporate all Pakhtun area into Pakistan. The line drawn on ethnic line is likely to yield lasting peace. The current line drawn on scientific lines as per the British, take into consideration only physical features and mostly pass over mountain ranges without regard to composition of population on both sides of the line. This has divided the Pakhtun in two and this is the single most important cause of unrest in the region. This historical anomaly needs to be fixed on urgent basis as part of preparation of departure of western forces from the region.

Comments (3)

Older Posts »