Arabian Brainpower

Can a $10-billion university restore science to the Islamic world? BY CHARLES Q. CHOI

On the shores of the Red Sea, near a small fishing village called Thuwal, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is launching a university with the ambition of making it a world leader in science and technology. Not only will the schoolcalled King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)possess one of the 10 largest university endowments in the world, it will also allow women and men to study side by side. The greatest challenge that the potentially revolutionary school now faces is attracting faculty and students.

Science once flourished in the Islamic world, a legacy seen today in the West with the use of Arabic numerals and words such as “algebra.” After the golden age of Islam ended with the Mongol invasion in the 13th century, this momentum vanished. “It’s recognized in several [United Nations] reports that the Arab and Muslim world now lags behind in science,” says Ahmad Al-Khowaiter, interim provost for KAUST. Such an assessment includes, for instance, the amount of money expended on research relative to the size of a country’s economy and the total number of research papers published and patents registered.

To initiate world-class research in Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah is personally granting KAUST an endowment of $10 billion or moreat least as much as that of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which currently ranks among the top half a dozen university endowments in the U.S. The graduate-level university will be completely independent of Saudi Arabia’s government, granting students and faculty academic freedom seen in universities worldwideand a freedom unprecedented in the kingdom. “It will not experience the interference a typical government-run university may,” Al-Khowaiter insists.

KAUST will enjoy the legal autonomy that is seen in enclaves elsewhere in Saudi Arabia for foreign oil workerswomen will be allowed to drive, for instance, and the religious police will be barred from the premises. Although Al-Khowaiter expects some resistance to such freedoms from the rest of the kingdom, he believes that “if we can show that we are able to benefit society, I think that kind of resistance will be overcome. If we do not show benefits, then resistance will have the effect of curtailing research.”

The nascent university’s biggest challenge may be drawing top-rated talent to a geographically isolated

MODEL SCHOOL: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, which showed off its planned campus at its October 2007 groundbreaking, hopes to have 425 research faculty members and 2,000 graduate students.

university with no track record. As enticement, KAUST will offer new labs with the best equipment and award grants to scientists. “Researchers won’t spend 50 percent of their time chasing after funding,” Al-Khowaiter says.

KAUST will also endeavor to overcome any isolation researchers might feel by keeping them linked with the rest of the worldallowing scientists to maintain appointments at other universities, for instance, and paying for travel to any meeting across the globe. In addition, KAUST will maintain a presence worldwide by collaborating with leading institutions, such as the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and funding scientists at other universities with up to $1 billion in grants over a period of 10 years.

To attract students, the university will initially offer full scholarships, not only to all graduate students but also to overseas juniors and seniors to cover the remaining tuition at their current institutions in return for commitments to enroll at KAUST. The point is “to have a stream of students present when the university opens,” Al-Khowaiter states. KAUST will give out these scholarships for at least its first 10 years.

Unusually, instead of organizing research around the single-discipline departments seen in most universities, KAUST will rely on interdisciplinary centers devoted to specific challenges, including energy research, water availability and sustainable development. “Such centers have been very successful worldwide in attracting scientists to work on big problems that require teams with many different disciplines,” Al-Khowaiter says. In the end, KAUST is aiming for a student population made up of roughly 40 percent from Saudi Arabia and other Arab states of the Gulf region, 30 percent from countries stretching between Egypt and India, and 30 percent from the rest of the world.

“Given the large fraction of the population of young people in the Arab and Muslim world, there is a huge need for graduate and postgraduate study programs, especially of the quality that KAUST promises to deliver, and it is certainly time to offer such programs,” says Ahmed Ghoniem, an M.I.T. mechanical engineer who is consulting for KAUST. “There is plenty of native brainpower that, if harnessed, can make a huge impact locally and globally.”

Ultimately, King Abdullah wants Saudi Arabia to transform from a kingdom based on oil to a more knowledge-based society, Al-Khowaiter explains. If successful, he adds, other countries in the Arab and Muslim world might follow suit. As Frank Press, president emeritus of the National Academy of Sciences, puts it: “This could be a nation-changing enterprise.”

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor.

© 2008 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.

Published by alaiwah

ALAIWAH'S PHILOSOPHY About 12 years ago, while studying Arabic in Cairo, I became friends with some Egyptian students. As we got to know each other better we also became concerned about each other’s way of life. They wanted to save my soul from eternally burning in hell by converting me to Islam. I wanted to save them from wasting their real life for an illusory afterlife by converting them to the secular worldview I grew up with. In one of our discussions they asked me if I was sure that there is no proof for God’s existence. The question took me by surprise. Where I had been intellectually socialized it was taken for granted that there was none. I tried to remember Kant’s critique of the ontological proof for God. “Fine,” Muhammad said, “but what about this table, does its existence depend on a cause?” “Of course,” I answered. “And its cause depends on a further cause?” Muhammad was referring to the metaphysical proof for God’s existence, first formulated by the Muslim philosopher Avicenna. Avicenna argues, things that depend on a cause for their existence must have something that exists through itself as their first cause. And this necessary existent is God. I had a counter-argument to that to which they in turn had a rejoinder. The discussion ended inconclusively. I did not convert to Islam, nor did my Egyptian friends become atheists. But I learned an important lesson from our discussions: that I hadn’t properly thought through some of the most basic convictions underlying my way of life and worldview — from God’s existence to the human good. The challenge of my Egyptian friends forced me to think hard about these issues and defend views that had never been questioned in the milieu where I came from. These discussions gave me first-hand insight into how deeply divided we are on fundamental moral, religious and philosophical questions. While many find these disagreements disheartening, I will argue that they can be a good thing — if we manage to make them fruitful for a culture debate. Can we be sure that our beliefs about the world match how the world actually is and that our subjective preferences match what is objectively in our best interest? If the truth is important to us these are pressing questions. We might value the truth for different reasons: because we want to live a life that is good and doesn’t just appear so; because we take knowing the truth to be an important component of the good life; because we consider living by the truth a moral obligation independent of any consequences; or because we want to come closer to God who is the Truth. Of course we wouldn’t hold our beliefs and values if we weren’t convinced that they are true. But that’s no evidence that they are. Weren’t my Egyptian friends just as convinced of their views as I was of mine? More generally: don’t we find a bewildering diversity of beliefs and values, all held with great conviction, across different times and cultures? If considerations such as these lead you to concede that your present convictions could be false, then you are a fallibilist. And if you are a fallibilist you can see why valuing the truth and valuing a culture of debate are related: because you will want to critically examine your beliefs and values, for which a culture of debate offers an excellent setting.

2 thoughts on “Arabian Brainpower

  1. Moonlight in a bottle – for Valentine?

    One of the few things that are still free of charge nowadays is the moonlight.

    The moon reflects the sunlight to brighten up most of our nights. The moon’s gravity generates the tides in our oceans. These are visible signs of the moon’s impact.

    Yet, the full role of the moon in all life on Earth is still largely unknown.

    The moon seems to affect the mood of people as its gravity and the rays it emits stimulate the chemistry of the body and mind. Some people, like artists, are very receptive to its influence. They report high levels of inspiration on full moon days.

    The moon shines and emits rays for everyone whatever race, culture or religion. It is a true democrat.

    The receptiveness to the moon’s beneficial rays depends not on the location on Earth, but on the receiver. Spiritually mature people are the most receptive. Some report lightness of the mind and positive effects on the body.

    Judging by the present trends in marketing, which often tries to sell us anything even though it is worth little or nothing, one day we might well be able to buy moonlight in a bottle. Bottles taken to the moon and closed at the height of the full moon and then taken back to Earth to be sold as an exclusive product to make you feel good. The bottle will undoubtedly come in a common, luxury and premium edition. Like so many products these days.

    Sounds exaggerated? Are they not already selling pieces of land on the moon? Nothing seems to be too absurd an idea or some clever guy makes a business out of it.

    The moon is not something to be taken lightly. The impact of the moon on the entire Earth is much larger than known today.

    The moon shines for everyone and especially for those that shine as caring and sharing personalities. You cannot buy a personality or the moonlight. You have to deserve them.

    Invest in humanity and the moon will make you shine from within as a diamond and boost your energy and spirits.

    Moonlight, diamond bright.

    Danellandia Foundation
    for healthy people on a healthy planet
    http://www.danellandia.net

Leave a comment