Please note that as per the details, the Koran motivates the Muslims to HATE and KILL the non Muslims!) and dissuades Muslims to fight against Muslims if a war is declared by the Non-Muslim govt. against the Islamic Govt./State.
For more information on Koran & Islam please see any book or booklet by the renowned Scholar of Islam, the late ANWAR SHAIKH of Cardiff, Wales.
ISLAM & TERRORISM.ISBN: 09536683-7-1;
ISLAM, THE ARAB NATIIONAL MOVEMENT, ISBN: 0-9513349-4-8;
FAITH AND DECEPTION, ISBN: 0 95 133495 6.
We recommend THE KORAN AND THE KAFIR (ISLAM & THE INFIDEL) by A. GHOSH, ISBN: 0-9611614-0-X.
Caution! Very graphic scenes!
Not for the faint hearted!
This is Actually Happening in Syria & Iraq by ISIS.
“FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE JEWS BUT I WAS NOT A JEW AND SO I DID NOT PROTEST…
THEN THEY CAME FOR THE CATHOLICS BUT I WAS NOT A CATHOLIC AND SO I DID NOT PROTEST……THEN THEY CAME FOR ME AND THERE WAS NOBODY LEFT TO PROTEST”
– MARTIN NIEMOLLER A GERMAN PASTOR DURING HITLER’S HOLOCAUST.
This IS ISLAM followed & practiced by Al Qaeeda & Jihadist ISIS is following it.
DISGUSTING TO EVEN THINK SUCH THINGS HAPPENING
Published by alaiwah
ALAIWAH'S PHILOSOPHY
About 12 years ago, while studying Arabic in Cairo, I became friends with some Egyptian students. As we got to know each other better we also became concerned about each other’s way of life. They wanted to save my soul from eternally burning in hell by converting me to Islam. I wanted to save them from wasting their real life for an illusory afterlife by converting them to the secular worldview I grew up with.
In one of our discussions they asked me if I was sure that there is no proof for God’s existence.
The question took me by surprise. Where I had been intellectually socialized it was taken for granted that there was none.
I tried to remember Kant’s critique of the ontological proof for God. “Fine,” Muhammad said, “but what about this table, does its existence depend on a cause?” “Of course,” I answered. “And its cause depends on a further cause?” Muhammad was referring to the metaphysical proof for God’s existence, first formulated by the Muslim philosopher
Avicenna.
Avicenna argues, things that depend on a cause for their existence must have something that exists through itself as their first cause. And this necessary existent is God. I had a counter-argument to that to which they in turn had a rejoinder. The discussion ended inconclusively.
I did not convert to Islam, nor did my Egyptian friends become atheists. But I learned an important lesson from our discussions: that I hadn’t properly thought through some of the most basic convictions underlying my way of life and worldview — from God’s existence to the human good.
The challenge of my Egyptian friends forced me to think hard about these issues and defend views that had never been questioned in the milieu where I came from.
These discussions gave me first-hand insight into how deeply divided we are on fundamental moral, religious and philosophical questions. While many find these disagreements disheartening, I will argue that they can be a good thing — if we manage to make them fruitful for a culture debate.
Can we be sure that our beliefs about the world match how the world actually is and that our subjective preferences match what is objectively in our best interest? If the truth is important to us these are pressing questions.
We might value the truth for different reasons: because we want to live a life that is good and doesn’t just appear so; because we take knowing the truth to be an important component of the good life; because we consider living by the truth a moral obligation independent of any consequences; or because we want to come closer to God who is the Truth. Of course we wouldn’t hold our beliefs and values if we weren’t convinced that they are true. But that’s no evidence that they are.
Weren’t my Egyptian friends just as convinced of their views as I was of mine? More generally: don’t we find a bewildering diversity of beliefs and values, all held with great conviction, across different times and cultures? If considerations such as these lead you to concede that your present convictions could be false, then you are a fallibilist.
And if you are a fallibilist you can see why valuing the truth and valuing a culture of debate are related: because you will want to critically examine your beliefs and values, for which a culture of debate offers an excellent setting.
View more posts
NEVER MIND 
waao